If the IAF is having issues with its flankers because of the engines, expecially given its a maintiance issue which should be the same across the family of engines pretty much then the PLAAFs J-11s and J-10s will or have had the same issue. Worse for a single engine fighter like J-10.
Because India is a maritime nation more so than China since its surrounded by the ocean on 3 sides with India sticking out a like an arrow. The Indian Ocean is the busiest Ocean in the world with goods reaching a a massive continent Africa to East Asia and beyond. The carriers are for India...
With the education in madrassas he/she won't have a bank let alone a swiss bank account. So why teach them just not to steal? when you could be teaching them how to make money and progress at the same time?
I say despite all the good cause being taunted to by Madrassas, India should not...
Wrong again. Unless you want to hit pirate ships which of course are really small just single leaking bucket. This weapon has yet to evolve to a precision weapon that can be used against a movable single target, when it does, it will be a break through. You could hit a column of moving armor...
Ur arguments poor considering his statement was flawed.
This MLRS maybe able to hit ships, but given its range/coverage its not a cost effective solution to deny the shoreline compared to cruise missiles air or land launched with ranges upto 1000 km these days only limited by detection. I think...
The middle kingdom doesn't have the airbases near the indo-tibet border to accommodate all its birds but only a fraction not to mention at higher altitudes payloads are reduced and engines are shortening their life span that more quickly. Compared to the IAF which can accommodate half or more...