Search results

I find people who are insecure see secularism as evil. In a majority muslim state, why do they need to be protecting muslims? But you, have made a lot of enemies of your own. I want to see your Pakistani passport please.

Alright, you right. You know it all. You should really run the FO of Delhi because you can pick up on news articles. I do however have one question for you. Which nation would let India lease and buy a SSN?

Russia was, is stagnet. But India isn't. India needs resources and Russia has it. Russia has a huge potential to meet the energy demands of Asia. This has yet to be realized. Russia is not ripping India off. Your just misinformed as a lot of people are.

Agreed, a lot of their yards are in need of of sweepers and new tools but they still have the designers, engineers and skilled labourers. It may not be the best of quality but the are the yards that still build Yasen class SSN. With enough money, they are credible. However they are lacking...

The Russians have the experience. Its not as much as the US but the USSR did have some pretty good RnD. Russia was involved with supplying parts of designs and machines for the Vikrant. Nope. The Falcrum still can not take of with a full payload from STOBAR. CATABOR would increase and max...

The French had issues with their own AC. So who else is reliable enough? US of A? I don't see an issue with slight modification to the landing gear. The design is superior to Hornets, Flankers etc when it comes to short takeoffs with with out catapults. The entire body of the Falcrum...

Tell that to your population. Policy in Pakistan since its inception was to be an equal to India. And i'm not going to teach someone history or politics. As i've said before, to many members on this forum. Take a class in political sciences. Because your science is wrong.

Mandatory military training was a thing recently wasn't it? Chinese teens complain compulsory military training too difficult, but teachers say toughen up Chinese teens complain compulsory military training too difficult, but teachers say toughen up | South China Morning Post my mistake for...

Carriers can do a lot more than fight. They have variety of mission scopes. It is why Italy, builds them, so does UK and France. Now Japan sees the need to have VtoL. And as i've said before. Carriers are a force multiplier, well worth their costs. Ask a naval admiral. The only ones who...

Numbers are scary, but its the only source of accuracy. But I know bullsh1te when I read it or see it. India does NOT spend more defence than China not even its GDP which is poor way to scope a budget. India spends a lot of defense but CCP is a lot more insecure in this regard. Remember in...

You never replied to my post but you still keep on trolling? As i've stated before the aircraft carrier is force multiplier, with out it, the IN would require a much larger surface fleet. And taking into consideration the immediate neighbour hood, its a good idea for India to carry a large...

You are no student of history. Nehru, recognized Tibet as part of China. Look in to the records. The Dalia Lama was disappointed and recieved support from the CIA but NOT nehru. Infact, the Dalia Lama is NOT using India as launch platform. In 1962 the IA had a manpower of 2 lakh. Thats...

Right and Wrong. You see, any war with the Philippines would shut down economic corridors and raise prices of oil and goods. SCS is a busy route. Any war, would escalate and bring in neighbours. The reason I believe the USN would interfere is because, they already will for Japan and SK, so...

Because the CCP is always insecure and trying to get political points. India has similar problem with Beijing supporting Pakistans military. Solution, piss of the CCP by working with USN. During the malabar ex in Bay Bengal, the CCP actually send a demarche to each nation, Japan US India...

If IN didn't go for carriers, than the Surface combatant ships would require a lot more air defence ships with longer range SAMs etc.. A carrier is force multiplier and very useful for navies. 1 carrier is cheaper than half dozen destroyers hence why those with out carriers USSR PLAN have...

Domestic problems. In the event of war, half our boys are their to protect the assets in India, NOT make war. Pakistan, China would use Indians against Indians. Internal weakness. The machines are useful as well and reduce reliance. Then the other is the UN peacekeeping force, humanitarian...

The Vietnamese don't require USN help. They have the Onix but i'm not sure of its range. This is enough to keep any PLAN ship off its coast. Not to mention, the Vietnamese are being trained in Indian academies from all 3 branches. However, weapons sales is what those exercises are about...

Or perhaps thats what the media would have you believe? Think about it. If you were the PM or president, wouldn't you be above this holy cow? This is media war! JNU agitated the right, the right attacked back and so on. Why would Modi, proposily delute his power?

Its been state policy. A professor pointed this out to me. Promotes CCPs rule, even though they are NOT responsible for the growth. Only the economy is. And being next to the 2nd largest market, ie Japan helped immensely. But no one cares, the Chinese will be the victims of CCPs propaganda...

And this is parliament should be talking about.