International interference (of any sort) in a disputed territory. Objection is not to the purpose of the dam, but international support.
I concur, lets continue doing what we have been doing before and after the 'tamasha'...
And this is what creating the current problems, isn't it? Not telling people that this things are downright wrong and you should keep away from them. People were not told keeping a slave is wrong, but freeing a slave is good thing. Two have a big difference.
A religion, no matter which, is...
Slavery was never right. It was a common practice but not right. And a perfect religion should have opposed it from the vary beginning, not make rules around it.
Just means no religion is perfect!
Sure dude, all the election manifesto, public opinions, election campaigns, debates etc are all lie. India didn't elect him to perform better, but just to fight a needless war. And it is always India that has to back down and stop, it is the right of Pakistan to fire the first and the last...
Complete HB report wasn't publicized, neither the interview you are quoting gives full details. You are ignoring the events which led up to forward policy, whose immediate aftermath was the conflict.
I am not going to say Pakistani army. I will leave that to your imagination.
When did he say Pakistan is the enemy. He said two distinct statements, hurt Pakistan, and make enemy realize that his tactics won't be tolerated. Simply means enemy would be hurt and message would be delivered by hurting Pakistan. You are the one picking the wrong meaning out of his statements...
Half truth. This article you keep on posting doesn't give details about events leading up to forward policy and unilaterally declare it to be the cause of war. Second, no matter how worse was your famine, your country and army were better equipped and prepared for a war than India, whose PM was...
Pakistani army did suffer, there are Indian reports all over the place (from Pakistani point of view there soldiers are superman, no amount of bombing/shooting can hurt them!)
And no where did anyone say that Pak army is the enemy. I only said that Pakistani govt and common citizens are not enemy.
GoI site doesn't have 2014 data yet, that is what I posted before. And even when it was worst hit, economy grew by 4.5% nominal. That means per capita increased in INR.
PPP dude, this is why PPP. It takes into account prices of local goods.
The drastic change in the figures don't reflect actual change, is what I meant. The figures look good because of change in base year. Doesn't mean economy suddenly got so much better in just one year. It just mean that...
As I said, point out when in past 16 years did they label China as enemy? Irrelevant of what words our govt throws out..
Certainly not the Pakistani govt or the people! And I hope you are with equal zeal calculating the Indian causality caused by the mindless Pakistani bombing. Off course, for...
Can you point out within past 16 years when Indian govt labeled Chinese govt? Or we just have to assume your words are word of god and absolute truth?
The people with which we are engaged in constant violence are enemy, aren't they? Than again, he didn't called Pakistani govt to be the enemy!
I earn 100 Rs. My meal cost 50 Rs. It is independent of short term fluctuations of the currency valuations. When INR was 50 Rs a dollar, I earned 2 dollars and had enough money for 2 one dollar meals. But when INR became 60Rs a dollar, I am earning less than 2 dollars. Does it changes how many...
You are quoting USD values, which are dependent on USD/INR conversion rates. Indian recorded growth is 4.5%, which is higher than the population growth. As I said above, we are comparing economic conditions of the people of the respective countries, for which national currency is the proper way...