Search results

Well, we rly dont have any problem from the pro pakistan kashmiris to shift to p0k. Atlast we agreed on something.

Check out the shimla agreement plz

??? http://www.jammu-kashmir.com/archives/archives2007/kashmir20070306d.html You did not think about the will of kashmiris while signing the shimla agreement

Nope, first pakistan has to demilitarize, then india will remove majority of forces but will keep enough to defend another invasion by pakistan and only then will plebiscite be called for if UN is satisfied that there are no outsiders. U have let punjabis settle in p0k, and given a pieace to...

When the partition happened, muslims migrated from even up to pakistan. U did not care about muslim much back then. Although the present day pakistan had the majority muslim population, but they did not vote for the muslim league ( correct me if i am wrong). It was muslims from muslim minority...

I think every indian in this forum has posted the details of the UN SC resolutions a hundred times. But the other side just keeps on repeating the same old cry like a stuck tape recorder. They wont read it, even if they do, dont think they have the intellect to understand it. Thanks anyway

Then please carve out a tiny strip of land for the baluchis who want independence or please stop the hypocrisy

Arey bhai tumhare pass to atom BUM h, tumne kya ukhad lia? 70 sal se kashmir kashmir hi chilla rhe ho, patani kitne hazaro marwalie apne bande jihad k nam pe, apne banae hue sampo se aur adha mulk bhi kho bethe. Thoda to sharam krlo, zara chullu bhar pani lelo aur doob maro. Ya uske lie bhi...

Its all we can do, put facts through.But there is a impermeable wall between us, we bang our head on it from our side and they bang their heads on the other :hitwall:

Almost every terrorist attack in the world has a connection to pakistan. Almost all most wanted terrorists captured or killed in pakistan. I dont think u need more of a proof. Indian army went in after the things turned bad in 1989, after riots broke out, politicians were killed, pandits were...

But the people u r talking about are hardly in majority. Coz if whole of kashmir wanted azadi, they would have got it already. People in kashmir know its not gonna be in the interest of kashmir to be independent. Coz they have seen what has happened to pakistan, the hotbet of islamic terrorism...

Yet kashmiris join indian armed forces, check out the J&K rifles, join police forces, top indian civil services, and are into mainstream politics. You say there are 70 lakh kashmiris yet only thousands are protesting in kashmir.

Yes there is. The supporters of mumtaz qadri are very similar to the supporters of burhan wani. The elected reps were elected by more than 60% voter turnaout. That means majority do not subscribe to u or burhan wani's view. 20% of people cannot decide the fate of whole of kashmir. Period.

The elected representatives were elected by their own people, people of the villages. Burhan wani had warned anyone who would take part in the democratic process. These terrorists and huriat guys have always threatened people of kashmir not to vote but still there was more than 60% voting in...

He killed elected representatives of the village.... You might be one of the supporters of mumtaz qadri? Are u?

Who? The sarpanches? Democratically elected? U gotta be kidding me. If u r so cynical and pessimistic, how can i debate u? No argument is gonna shake your belief. Anyway here is a news article http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/cops-burhan-had-6-cases-against-him-2916742/

He was responsible for killing sarpanches during the past years and was very notorious for it.

Do u even know what u r talking about? Stop blaming others for ur sins. The liberal muslims kept silent while the fanatics had their way. Now it has been totally hijacked and every muslim has been painted by the same brush. But still the liberal muslims are not motivated enough to wipe these...

Islamic extreemism in london