You are the one who made the implication. Guess you don't want to clarify.
I'll give credit you are consistent in not addressing the second part also.
It is sad that Pak accepts china's investments, railway engines, planes and chinese treatment of its muslims but doesn't trust their medicines...
you sound suspicious of chinese medicines? Can you confirm that?
One can understand your suspicion, after all dogs in US are dying from eating chiinese made food.
In addition, you missed this part >>>>
also, accept India actions and move on?
There is an implication in that question. I'm asking for clarification of that implication.
Option A: you implied not bad thing about chinese medicines, ergo, you will use it for your near and dear
Option B: you implied chinese medicines can't be trusted ergo you will not use it
so what did...
Are you saying you can't trust chinese medicine quality? then what about the all the CPEC projects done with chinese collabaration. Pakistan trains run on chinese engines!
also, accept India actions and move on?
So is helping the sick more important than helping indian hegemony continue. Monies made from the medicine sale will definitely help India more, both economically and in PR. Why not import from China. After all CPEC shows the cooperation. Can't be that difficult to get medicines from China...
So trade with India when its beneficial, even if it means that it helps India more?
Runs counter to all the ranting and raving. Besides does this mean trade is no longer suspended with India?
Utterly confusing!
Besides, what is the plan when Indians no longer want to export medicine to Pak?
Is this halal?
https://www.geo.tv/latest/246497-pakistan-permits-trade-of-life-saving-drugs-with-india-amid-tensions-over-occupied-kashmir
Pakistan permits trade of life-saving drugs with India amid tensions over occupied Kashmir
ISLAMABAD: The federal government on Monday allowed the import of...
Nah. non state actors are state sponsored thugs, which give plausible deniability for the state. War is expansive business and non state actors avail themselves to the funds from terrorist govts.
One consequence of non state actors is that the rest of the state can pay the price. those...
that brings the question. Is it cowardice or capability? IS Pak army conventionally strong enough to take Kashmir while protecting Lahore? If it is cowardice, who is the coward? Bajwa or PMIK?
Back to more non state actors?
https://www.geo.tv/latest/246433-pm-imran-says-pakistan-will-not-make-first-move-in-war-with-india
LAHORE: Prime Minister Imran Khan said Monday Pakistan would not make the first move if war broke out with India.
Addressing the International Sikh Convention's closing session here during his...
https://www.siasat.com/pakistan-will-not-start-war-india-imran-khan-1604466/
Islamabad: Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Monday assured that his country won’t be the first to use nuclear weapons in case of war or conflict with India.
“We both are nuclear-armed countries. If these tensions...
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2043611/2-lack-funds-keeps-chashma-power-units-closed/
ISLAMABAD:
A parliamentary panel was informed on Tuesday that two units each of Chashma and Mangla hydroelectric power projects had been closed since 2016 and 2017 respectively whereas the government was not...