Search results

You can be proud using arabic words in your proud "Indian" languages. By more pure I mean more indo-aryan.

Well if you read what he said, "hard to think as a pashtun". Thats racism. He talked about skin color. I talked about skin color. There is nothing being a racist about talking about skin colors.

Being racist doesn't change a thing. Indians, Bengals and Sri Lankas are very dark thats a fact. Pakistanis are in average light skinned but there are also some dark ones because of migration from Indians and africans. And Kashmiris are still not "Indians". Just give Kashmir back to Pakistan...

Who taught you these words? The great "Indian" Sanskrit language?

Like I said the race and religion of Indus Valley Civilisation (sindh) is unknown but it has nothing to do with "India". Aryans mixed with these people of todays Pakistan (Iranian-dardic-Indo-Aryan). Some dravidians from India came to Balochistan settled there down, better known as "Brahui"...

Now we are coming near the truth. Thank you. Punjabis and Sindhis are more pure than North Indians. Indo-Aryans settled mostly in the Indus River (Eastern Pakistan). But still the old race of Indus Valley Civilisation is unknown. Yes there was a version of this cult in Kashmir and even in Punjab...

Indo-Aryan languages are assosiated with indo-aryan languages. Iranian languages are assosiated with Iranian languages. Dardic languages are assosiated with Dardic languages (although scientists are not sure if it is Nuristani languages or Indo-Aryan languages). "Indian" languages and "Indian"...

Again the claim of Sanskrit being "Indian". Go speak your dravidian/african languages. Whole of todays Pakistan was not part of British India until British included it in "British Bollywood". All of todays Pakistan was included in its predecessor states.

The people of Indus Valley Civilisation (Sindh) were not Aryan, they were the ancestors of todays Pakistan and its ethnics. Which race they belonged is unknown. Aryan mixed with these people in the Indus Valley Civilisation. So came Pashtun, Baloch, Sindhis, Punjabis and Kashmiris. Aryan...

Not Indiawww.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Xl5jHBHO0Not india Ok, just remove "Not India" Than you have the link

Of course akhi: Edit: It doesn't work, it is putting the link always as a video

Thats the Indian logic. Everything is wrong, except what Indians say. Are you guys Indians from India or are you Indians from America (Native Americans), because your Europeans creators didn't even get that right.

The claim of Sanskrit of being Indian is wrong. Indo-Aryan languages were brought from the Aryans (Indo-Iranian) and spread over Iranian plateau and east Pakistan and later over North India. Dravidian Languages are the real "Indian" Languages and race. Punjabis and Sindhis do have similarities...

Yes because Kashmiris are dardic people. Linguistically dardic languages are somewhere between Nuristani and Indo-Aryan Languages. Dardic people are by race more East-Iranian. The closest people related to Kashmiris are Pashtuns by similar DNA. Kashmiris even have rubab insturment and similar...

How should Pakistanis learn Koshur if your Bollywood Army occupied Kashmir including the Kashmir valley. In Pakistan live many Kashmiris who fled from your Occupation and some of them speak and understand Koshur. Kashmir itself is a multi ethnic state. That still doesn't make Kashmiris...

And people believe Kashmir is India, subhanallah

How are Muhajirs considered in Sindh? As Muhajirs or just Urdu Speakers?

Ah ok, but we can not 100% rely on wikipedia.

Where did you get these numbers akhi? It could be Sindhi Baloch or Baloch are in these 2% other ethnicities. Allahu alim.

Thats why we are proud Pakistanis, Pashtun and Baloch living in Tando Adam (Sindh) under the flag of Islam and Pakistan the country of our ethnics and races: