Search results

Talks in the current scenario are redundant. Only post a conflict can talks be of value as the past has shown. Musharraf, you mean the 'master mind behind Kargil? Him and peace don't belong in the same sentence. Sure, go ahead and conduct a vote, it'd be meanigless anyway. There are steps...

This is just plain retarded. The minister was merely highlighting how while Pak exports what is exports best, terrorists to India and other regions, it suffers worse blowback from its own creations. There is no admission of any support for attack on civilians on our part. However, if you do...

Of course we aren't friends. China is a country that shleters a state that sponsors terrorists against India. It has constantly blocked sanctions against known terror outfits. That;s more than enough to cast aside any silly Nehruvian ideas of friendship with China. NSG will happen sooner rather...

Well sumarized but hardly a new diagnosis. Pseudo-liberal support for radical versions of a 'certain' religion is well know. Moreover, these parties are not known to have a stellar record of nationalism, so blood of our secutiry forces can hardly e expected to give them pause. Anyway, most...

If they want support in SCS against ICJ ruling for favouring India's NSG bid, forget it. That'd would be short sighted. Although one can always change their stance on SCS, not the same case with NSG once we are in. :lol:

Dismissed with contempt - about right I'd say.

Kindly clarify on 'deflection propoganda'. If Iran is a 'victim' of Indian terror, let them raise the issue with us or with UN. As things stand today, I am unaware of any such claim. Do feel free to elighten me. That's hardly relevant. East Pak was also supposedly your internal matter. This...

'Hiding behind', what childish rhetoric! If a lack of direct military intervention is 'hiding behind', what was China hiding behind every time Pak was begging for support during the wars with India? Nations don't work on school yard notions of hide behind, they only act based on a cost...

Are you sure about the part in bold? So this is a victory for Pak? Amusing interpretation. Anyway, I am confused by your next statement. If India has a lot to answer in Kashmir, why haven't you managed to make us answer? What makes you sure you'd be any more successful now than in the past...

Hmm... who asked you guys to back off? Please go ahead, press on harder. It will be interesting to watch in more ways than one.

Sure, sure, there is a lot of desperation going around.

Precisely, it would be silly for India to side with China when the international legal system has ruled against them. I'm sure we aren't that immature.

Hmm... you guys would know a lot about that I suppose. Anyway, let's wait and watch. I see little reason to go overboard over this just yet. Though this is significant coming from the PM of India, without follow-up it will be as meaningless a statement as those regularly made by your officials.

Apparently the MEA intervened for quick release, utterly unwarranted in my opinion.

A pleasant surprise. Hope we get follow through. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Baloch-activists-welcome-PM-Modi-comment-on-Balochistan/articleshow/53685684.cms

So Pak is analogous to the Kauravas? Hmm.. no, Kauravas too good to be a fair analogy.

This is too good for the BJP to have not had a hand working in the shadows. Actually, I hope they did. Needs to be replicated in other states.

Media doesn't even impact elections significantly in India, its hardly going to cause a war. All wars have been initiated by Pak actions, the next one will be too - likely through a major terror attack.

Debatable. Anyway, the Russians selling anything to Pak that has any impact on India would be just silly, will only lead India to cut down import from Russia further. Look at the last para of the OP and how the Russian fellow puts it. Anyway, you guys jump at little things. Let something...

Oh what will India do now? How can we nuke subs, Bhamos, 5th gen fighters etc. compete with 4 Mi-35? Also, read the fine print - if Pak can pay. Russia is in no position for anything but hard cash.