Figure out the context or just let it be. The discussion was about Baloch, not a comparison with Kashmir.
How do you even judge the veracity of random posters on the net? Anyone can post anything.
Also, are you under the assumptions that agencies around the world do not employ people to shape...
Sure, your leaders; unless you wish to deny your associations with Pak, given the context of the discussion.
For figures of casualty in Baloch, those by Pak officials would inherently be suspect. Any third party figures would be useful.
The article touches upon some interesting examples of Chinese economic influence.
Travel blogs? They do seem a more reliable source of info than the GoI is likely to have, or perhaps not.
Still, supremely better than the nonsense 30,000 RAW agents in Pak that you leaders band about...
A weak reason to deduce India is not fine with the status quo. As I mentioned, we don't go around begging for talks. We are vastly more interested in developing than in resolving issues with Pak. Now that the generation of leaders who had some nostalgic connection with Pak is gone, its all hard...
That's okay, I have been convinced since your third post that you have little clue what you are talking about, even if your sincere about peace. You need to read up. Go read Simla agreement, why Pak does not uphold it and maye you can figure out for yourself how silly your suggestion was.
This is the best way forward.
Nations of SAARC have a lot to gain from India and we are interested in a peaceful and economically progperous region.
Let Pak whine.
Yawn, empty threats from a random stratnger on the net. Ooh I am shaking.
As expected, you have little knowledge of what you are talking about. Bye, do read up and come back later.
As for democracy, first let people of GB vote, then talk about referendums.
Again, your opnioin on me or what I am doing here is woefully insignificant.
Past is not forgotten easily, not without making sure crimes are paid for or future capability to cause mischief neutralized.
Pak is not a nation that we can trust to uphold any agreements when it does not even...
Where's the part about Iran of Afghanistan being uneasy. Its the ususal anti-Modi rant, hardly anything substantive.
You are suffering from delusion of grandeur. There is nothing that Pak is capable of that would deter an Indian leader from such talk if he so wished.
Besides, you accuse us of...
Chinese media is just blatant propoganda, hardly to be taken seriously.
India is not going to back China on SCS against any international rulings. Obviously, state propoganda would portray as China not even seeking support.
As for negative sentiments regarding China in the Indian populace, a...
Almost everything related to Pak is meaningless as far as I am concerned, there's hardly much contention to that particular notion.
I feel neither the need, nor any desire to apprise you of my reason to post on this site.
If you wish to continue this discussion, kindly state how a vote...
It would have been foolish of India to ever trust likes of Musharaf post his retarded misadventure in Kargil. Moreoever, considering his end, there was no gurantee he could even deliver on what he promised.
Your opinion on Modi is meaningless to this discussion, what you consider him to be...
Again, that's fine with us. India in satisfied with the status quo; thus, no talks or talks that go nowhere are a perfectly acceptable scenario for us.
With Baloch and P0K angle being brought in by the government, no talks suit us even more. For Pak's mischeif in the vallley, we have plenty to...