Search results

sorry other Indian friends here, but i have to reply and remind .please remember what you did when Nader interred to India.

I agree with you, but he replied to "Tshering22" ,comments towards Iranian and shia, in first page. I do not agree to generalize because of mistake of one guy but i did not see any comment from indian side to ask Tshering22 to be polite. off course if you shoot then will get back. if anyone...

i agree with you ,but as long as a country has that. owners of N.W have no right to asked other countries to live in the threat of N.W without trying to have it

this comments shows you do not know anything about Iran, 1- Iran got Islamic culture from Islam but arabs 2-most of development in Islamic country happened by Iranian scientist 3- even arabic grammar developed by Iranian. 4-........

i don't answer your comment about Iran domestic issues coz what you wrote is meaningless and maybe you can apply about india in another way. about the nuclear weapons, i guess it is not in Iran strategic plan to make a N.W ,but the country like India who has N.W has no right to say Iran should...

what India , USA and KSA are doing somewhere you are labeling to Iran

did you well? in that fight we shot down your helicopter and you our boat.

we had battle in Persian Gulf during Iraq-Iran war, we shot down your helicopter and you our boat, and you learned much of that. since 1988 Iran covered her gaps much more than you advanced yourself

I agree Iran policy must be made carefully, also Iran should not underestimate US guns in region BUT we should not underestimate ourself too.Iran can not win in a complete war with US for sure but Can defend herself, if war happen Iran will shot down US with herself that is Iran's deterrence

That was for 30 years ago. Iran science and technology development is 11 time faster than average seed in world, then you can see this development effect in Iran army.

if you read your all comments, they do not approve your point, maybe i did not understand your comments, but you support your king policy which is in favor of Zinost security

if no firefrom Hejaz territory , Iran wont attack there. you paid alomst $100 b to Saddam Iran did not fire you, do you remember?

at same time wikilicks disclosed that Saudi sercretly asked US to attack Iran

Iran international relation is not base on installing shia government ry but supporting islamic movements( Hammas, Tonnesia, ...), as you admit removing Saddam did not make iran and US relation better. besides Iran did not want to install so called pro-Iran government in Iraq but remove the...

this is western prespective of the story, the blam Iran for rejecting a tactical ceasfire while finally they had to admit Saddam was war starter

people do not need Iran teach them anythings, I have many Sunni and Shia friends from Hejaz, even my Sunni friends confirm what happening there to all people particularly to Shia.

please do not put comment about what you have little information. the best proof for that Iran decision was right to rejecting ceasefire is when Iran accept ceasefire in 1988 Iraq started new wave of attacks to Iran just few days later, and invaded parts of Iran even more than first year of the...

then you are blind

are you talking about justice in Hejaz when the people of south can not enjoy the good universities of Riyadh?

Bush could not do too.