"Commissioner Ka kuttaa Gum " ho gaya, usse to badhiya hain news.
Jokes apart, These kinda news should be highlighted in both Indian and Pakistani media to reduce/calm hatred towards each other.
because muslims were praying there from more than 100 years.
and all the party involved in case were unable to prove that the land belongs to them. so they divided the property in all 3 party. according to article 12 of Indian constitution.(I'm not sure about the number of the article)
Let...
the guy whom you quoted is right.
The case was started in 1885 by mahant of the akhada who got 1/3 part but at that time English court discarded the application that it is too late.
in 1950s, the Akhada filed another suit in the court about ownership and the verdict came last day was about that...
First of all, court did not give its decision on riot, it was about ownership of the land. so, do not mix it with the riots. Second of all, the construction of masjid was illegal there.
look at this way,
Court said to minority that look, your construction of masjid was illegal and you have no...
Construction of masjid was illegal at the first place.
All three party were unable to provide the proof of ownership so according to article 12(?) of Indian constitution, it was divided to all 3 party.
connanxlrc1000 and marcos98, thanks for the nice pics.
can you please give me the original source of the pics?
I want to forward those pics to the local newspapers in Australia. Thanks.