Search results

Evil? Coward? Thats why they few thousands were able to hold millions of people bharat for 3 centuries, historians call them one of the largest centralized states known in pre modern world history who have set example of Courage before the world. They managed to show their bravery and...

I clearly wrote wrote our books are wriiten by cambridge university writers which is i believe in England not in Saudi Arabia, Are the brits also wahabbi

I said if kashmiri freedom fighters can be classified as terrorists then shivaji would be classified as terrorist Most Historians dont even know Shivaji, We in pakistan are taught in history books wriiten by cambridge uni that he asked for negotiation, killed afzal khan and ran away like a...

You know nothing about hinduism, brahminism and vedism so i am not going to waste my time teaching you about your religion, I can give you names of dozens of history books which says hinduism developed out of brahmanism but no your knowledge is at grade 3 level, I mostly have discussion with...

The land pakistan was always there but with different names, just because before 1947 there was no word as pakistan doesn't mean you can hijack our history and claim ranjith who was born in gujranwala pakistani as bharti, We still have gujrawala this makes ranjith pakistani, his Samadhi is also...

I know sindhi in dari becomes hindu The word hindu was always a secular term, According to most iranian history books not Bharati history books, Hindu means black, When sassanid empire occupied Sindh in 2nd century they encountered a lot of black people, so they named the region hindustan...

mate i have dozens of history books on bharat and not a single book says anything about battle of rajhastan

This is not what historians say, Delhi is the tradition capital of Hindustan, Whoever rules Delhi rules Bharat, Why are you bringing South india, It was never included in Hindustan, Hindustan includes north and central india, Shivaji fighters were guerrilla fighters who according to congress...

Ok, So now you people are saying pakistan is always separate from Bharat, Thats good When muslims arabs entered sindh it was ruled by a repressive Hindu kingdom who were ruling a majority buddhist population, the same goes for multan, The arabs destryed those kingdoms. Hinduism is a gangetic...

Mate check this, the three tiny Benelux countries of Europe with a population of 27.7 million has a bigger econmomy than giant bharat which has a population of 100 billion people and their country size is 100 times bigger

Ok, I admit it wasn't 1000 year muslim rule it was almost 1200 years of muslim rule starting from 711AD to 1857 AD. What do you say to that, How are you going to deny your slavery, Read some history books

Mate you r gonna love this, a Superpower that does not have toilets India Needs Toilets to Save It’s Rivers | iNewp.com This is the future superpower

You proving me wrong? Are you drunk when did that happen

They have inherited the imperialist mentality of their previous masters, Brits, and they think they are the future superpower, forgeting one thing that before Brits it were muslims who for 1000 years were their rulers who bhartis are now dreaming to rule

What! I am really dissapointed by your comment, Brothers? We have no relation with bhartis, no matter how much these bhartis claim we dont look like them, The least densely populated states of bharat lie alongside pakistani borders and we share a huge desert(thar desert). We have nothing...

Ignore bhartis, These people are indoctrinated to claim all the land from Afganistan to Indonesia as Akhand Bharat, Their entire mythical history has been written by James princep a Brit who made fake heroes like Asoka, fake entities like bharat Bhartis are taught all of south asia was...

You people should be more ashmed than pakistanis, you people introduced terrorism in Pakistan subcontinent, you people introduced suicide bombing (RAW funded Tamil tigers) Gop has acknowleged those teenagers were pakistanis, and these attacks are just like returning the favour for what bharat...

You are missing the main point kashmir had to be given to us since this is what was agreed between Jinnah, Nehru and Mountbatten, Muslim majority for pakistan, hindu sikh majority for Bharat, Nehru reneged on his promise so we had to send someone and liberate our holy land.

Our western border will become safe and normal once america leaves and afghanistan is free from Bharati infestation, Pakistan's wild west have always been the word's most militarized zone, The british empire as a superpower fought there for 60 years and couldn't control the region, The solution...

Bharat illegaly occupied kashmir which was muslim majority, According to Two nation theory the muslim majority states would go to pakistan, Bharat treacherously occupied kashmir by showing a fake article of accession to UN.