Search results

What is the point of buying all this stuff if the saudis don't use them when required? As told by a saudi returned Sudanese to me...about the saudi reaction during Gulf war in 1991. " When Saddam attack, only two things work in Kingdom...patriot and ex-patriot, no saudi". (Say it with an arabic...

You really don't know what you are asking for?

Those were slugging matches nothing else. Most of the war was fought in Iraqi territory, that was poor example of maneuver warfare by the Iraqis. Saddam had no business running an army if he did not know that much. Just their bad luck.:?: Why don't you understand? There was no deployment in...

One based on mutual economic interest and not on politics.

The Bush admin is not distancing itself from the deal. What is your assumption based on? Maybe, but the plan is not falling in line with Uncle Sams scheme. We will lay our bets on siding them for the moment, we have gained nothing by being against them all these years. We'll access it our way...

The LTTE has gone mad.

We kicked the BJP out of power in the last elections, if you remember clearly. No one is immune to uncle Sam. You would know better that anyone. If you cannot correlate issues then don't discuss Indo-Pak relations. I am curious. Please give some example of your 'elite" crowd? Since you are so...

That would seem to most as the obvious case. If you read the signs properly, then you will realise that historically we have only reacting to situations imposed on us (1971 was the only exception). Even today we are only reacting, the initiative has always been with you.

Naw!...you are not a paratrooper. But what the hell, you get to be around all those hot air-hostesses.:rolleyes:

Spartan, The Persians had lost the battle of Marathon. The Spartans had 700 odd casulties to the 6000 odd casulties of the Persians.

The BJP came to power on their rightist ideology, which was short lived. Gujarat and Bombay are cases that are resultes of the Ayodhya issue, that was monopolised by them to come to power. Once they came to power they forgot about Ayodhya. While Kashmir is not their handywork, most of the...

It is unfortunate that you feel this way. As for India, Pakistan is not the main enemy.

No I am not. I am pointing out that just as there is pessimism about the deal there also support for it. All these debates and lobbying are part of any strategic international deal, more so if its about nuclear co-operation. Natwar Singh's comments are his view and are not necessarily...

Do post any link on that. I don't think RAW had any contacts in 1988 in NA, I can't say the same about now. Its ironical that you find the Congress more hardline than the BJP. If you want to discuss Balochistan then please do it in the thread already created. I have already posted my views there.

Certainly Read the second last para http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_10-1-2005_pg3_1 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-10-2004_pg3_4 http://www.southasianmedia.net/Magazine/Journal/islamicextremism_pakistan.htm

Actually it is Pakistani media reports that suggest this. If you don't know what happened in May 1988 in Balistan and the demands for a shia state of Balawaristan/ Karakoram state, then look up some study material on the same.

Black Caucus supports Indo-US N-deal Sridhar Krishnaswami in Washington | April 27, 2006 16:22 IST Giving a boost to the efforts to garner support for the Indo-US nuclear deal, lawmakers belonging to the African American Caucus in the US Congress have expressed support to the agreement and...

Why did the LTTE suddenly go on the offensive? I thought that the post-tsunami bonhomie would ease tensions in the island.