Search results

I fail what's so ironic about the juxtaposition of Sino-Viet relationship and Indo-BD relationship. For a English man though, you seem to possess one of the worst English proficiency skills I have ever seen (Now this is correct usage of irony).:woot::cheesy:

Even the 052D's role as sea-borne BMD platform and LACM launching platform would be "wasted" if it is inducted into service by BN, since it would be much more economic/effective if BD purchases ground-based HQ-9A SAM and ground-based DH-10 LACM instead to fulfill the same functionality if BD...

Don't BS like that, current block of J-15 is NOT equipped with AESA. The presence of the Pitot tube on the front of the production batch J-15 is indicative of the lack of AESA. Where as J-16, which is equipped with AESA, has already taken off its pilot tube on the front radar dome.

I fail to see a bigger lungi pole vaulter here other than you, deer sir. :what: If you beg to differ, please point him/them out for me. On the other hand, all I see is a bitter dude trashing on BD defense equipments by trolling them as "made in china toys" and that BD has no need for such...

LMAO, how you figure that the WZ-10's gun was a 14.5mm Gatling?!:crazy: I'm not even gonna bother pointing out all the other basic errors in this chart.

I only asked since the pricing of the export type 054A should be in line with BN's budget. The F-22P frigate (Export version of Type 053H3) that was sold and TOTed to PN costed $175M US while the domestic type 054A costs ¥ 1.58 billion=$254M US a piece to make. What I have seen from the export...

Right when you started you detailed the topic when you started talking about The 'the fire punch' of Indian destroyers and frigates and Pakistan nukes and missile tech.

As a Psy.D, I am fairly certain I am not suffering from any obsession compulsive disorder. You on the other hand, continues to troll in the Pak and BD subsection of the forum with a passion, With your misguided logic and broken In-glish. And for the record, I have only responded after seeing...

Guess the BN's at least considering this? China export version of 054class frigate

Of course BD should not be compared to with India. BD's a peaceful nation that have not invaded another's territory with no nuclear ambition. Whereas India is known to be a "terrorist state" that tries to undermine UN's non-proliferation treaty by playing with the big boys' (permanent members of...

Funny just how much you derailed from your initial argument of "can Pakistan afford the same":crazy: Seems like you finally accepted the fact that Pakistan doesn't have to get pay (or ripped off rather) the same way Indians do. Secondly, go ahead with giving away your sole Nuclear Sub to some...

What makes you think the Chinese would charge Pakistan the same price? Unless you are delirious about the nature of Russia's arms' deals with India, and truly believes that the offered price is indicative for an "Alliance". Then you would know China has never, and would never treat Pakistan the...

Funny how you can believe that the Russians would lend its nuclear sub to India and China won't do the same for Pakistan. I guess in your mind, the Sino-Pak relationship is not as solid as Indo-Russian relationship?! I suggest you have your logic checked by a mental health profession.

Plenty, since China has a shortage of skilled civil helo pilots, international pilots would be very much so welcomed.

yeah, I've noticed the differences and said the following in the post : BD type 056 launched in Wuchang Shipyard | Page 10 There are a few notable differences between the BN version and the domestic PLAN that I have noticed. Firstly, the absence of hull mounted sonar on the front of the vessel...

Official Chinese New Article: 西安将试点放开1000米以下低空空域 市民可空中游古城_新华网陕西频道 English Version: Opening of China’s low-altitude airspace to boost general aviation, ignores expanding civil aviation | CAPA - Centre for Aviation It's good that you pointed out the 100-1000 meter altitude for the use of Civil...

Here's two more photos from China: BTW, I can say for certain that "touching the giant globe" is not of an PLAN (Chinese) tradition, so it is most likely an BD tradition or a new CSIC "ritual".

Of course I read the word "dedicated", and I had already informed you that a "dedicated SAM" is nothing but a pure fabrication from your mouth, as no military in the world uses such bull shit term. And I fail to see where the dedicated word is in your first post "But did you called HQ-10 as SAM...

--"The gist of the article is that if there is any conflict in the East China Sea sector, or anywhere that requires the PLAN to deploy its fleet far from home ports". If the conflict is indeed stemming from the East China Sea sector (the most likely scenario in which the PLAN would be involved...