Search results

i gave an estimate man , u want source !!! just give a google search and find out urslf its everywhere on the net !!! i agree with u mate but to some extent , addition of weapons does adds up rcs, but it does not adds a hooligan rcs , airforces round the globe are not bunch of idiots who r...

if the f 16 gotta rcs of 1m2, then why da hell lca rcs be any higher, lca is smaller than f 16 and 40% of body weight is of composites , and 90% of body surface area is of composites and on that it got all those ram even its air inlets are designed in a shape that they protect engine blades...

http://www.iai.co.il/sip_storage/files/6/27546.pdf here it comes , sorry it was 150km max range against areal targets , and 160'nm' against sea targets , sorry i mixed 'em up a little !

i didn't said the whole army is corrupted , but a number of big player are , a bitter fact that is ain't deniable, but i still don't get why they r killing arjun for weaker tank that has lesser capabilities saying they want a fmbt , fmbt project has nothing to do with arjun or t 90, as i said...

itz gud to see , but the jet is pakfa not fgfa , itz atleast 8-10yrs to come :sniper: :sniper:

any estimates on range -+

the best wud be take elta 2052 , its is simply da best !

sorry buddy for multiple posts !!! i hv already seen dat pdf file , but i still dont know about it's detection or track range . plzz hlp

does lca has open architechure ? , senior membors plz put some light!

anyone has some info and specs like range , no' of targets of elta 2052 , then plzz tell !

an also why buy an imported jet when u get homemade one with similiar specs anhalf da price !!!!!

lca mk2 will have an aesa radar , a 95-100 kn engine , supercruise and thats wat da tech being added to gripen !!!!!!

gripen ng and lca mk2 will be lot similiar in capabilities be air to air or air to ground , dats why they r very comparable , and is da reason why gripen won't be chosen for mmrca !

lca is made acc to iaf's rquirement and it is a replacement for mig 21 , this fact does'nt mean prove that lca cant be compared to gripen , f22 is also made acc to usaf requiements and it is a replacement for f 15 , this does't mean it's justs like f 15 , same goes for lca (this is just an eg)...

the latest lca i said earliar is no prototype , it is limited series production an first batch of 20 will be delivered in starting months of 2011 an second batch before 2013 , and so u say it urslf dat jf 17 blk2 will not have weight reduction features so no change in payload

mate i'm new to this forum , plzz tell how to place an avatar pic ??

dream on with ur jf no one can stop u frm doi dat!!!!!! latest lca lsp flew with complete avionics package and radar ie with 2032 hubrid with 160km+ range and before lca mk1 production will end lca mk2 with aesa and a more powerful engine will be devloped and after dat lca mk2 production will...

last time i read about jf 's radar was dat it was carring a lighter version of one used on j 10 , and dat means reduced performance just by ur saying dat ur radar is long range radar an dat 'MEANS' dat itz havin a 150km range does not pruv dat it has range u provided , so plzz pull a link dat...

and the most important --- china is not inducting jf in its af , the sole developer of jf (although they say it is a joint venture but pak fan-boys has failed to figure out what they just did in it !!!!!!) is not inducting the jet !!!

i dont know why lca is cmpared to jf , jf is nowhere near lca as lca is far more better than jf even in current form !!! i say so bcoz 1- its lighter and even in its present state carries a more powerful engine 2- 2032 hybrid has 160km+ range whereas kj10 has only 105km 3- lca carries a 4t+...