Search results

well u couldn't take Kashmir by aggression which was ur prime motive...that was ur loss and we were able save Kashmir from ur dirty hands ..thats our victory !!! DREAM ON !!!! the point isin't u dont think u should reply .... actually the point is u CAN'T !!!!! and wats lol in indigenous...

SO U MEAN PAF HAD SUPERIORITY OVER IAF IN 65..... SO WHY DIDN'T U WIN THE WAR CUZ AIR SUP PLAYS VERY VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN WARS.... WHY DID UR COUNTRY LOST THE WAR WHEN IT HAD SUPERIORITY IN ONE AREA OF WAR ... WHY CUDN'T PAF PROVIDE SUFFICIENT GROUND SUPPORT PAK ARMY TO HLP IT WIN...

lca mk1 uses fe 404in20 engines ... but iaf is not happy with the thrust ... so lca mk2 version which will come with improved avionics , aesa radar and a 95-100kn class engine .... for which contenders(99 engines) are ej200 and fe 414 engines ...ej200 also has tvc on offer but is expensive too...

why cant akash and spyder sam do the job ???

plz do not compare iaf to paf ....... iaf is already much better than paf ..... we must see the chinese threat !!!! thats why i said 100 lca's is a pretty small....

this thread is a complete BULLSHIT AND DISRESPECTFUL !!!!! ALL U GUYS ARE INSULTING MY COMMUNITY !!!! PLZ CLOSE THIS THIS IMMEDIATELY .............. THIS MIGHT BE A SOURCE OF FUN FOR U GUYS BUT NOT FOR ME ...... I DIDN'T EXPECT SUCH KIND OF BEHAVIOR FROM THE MEMBERS OF THIS PDF ..

plz provide a link for this that might for just limited series .... i am sure they will improve the rate .....

any idea how may lca's can be made in a year by hal ...is it around 18-20 per yr or even less ?? once the mk2 is ready.. i think hal will open more production lines to increase the rate as current rate is quite low..

time's isin't always the same !!! back there we had economy crises... but now we are one of the worlds fastest growing economy !!!!!!!

no matter how much advanced tech u have ....you need to have suitable no.s to get the max advantage out of that tech...... hope u understand me this time ..... and seriously i don't think IAF will be stopping at just 100 .... u need to replace all those migs with aquality fighter !!!

lca was supposed to be the no.s fighter ...and when u have 300 air sup fighters .....i strongly feel lca should be lot more than that..... take a luk at usaf ....nearly half of their af is comprised of f16 versions !!!!!! i am not comparing iaf to usaf ..... but u ought to have a structure...

when we have a better and an even advanced version of arjun ie.......its mk2 tank coming ...... then why pour the money on arjun and not on arjun mk2 ........ ask urself and plzz use some common sense before writing ur posts !!!!!!!!!!!!!! :hitwall: :hitwall: :hitwall:

thats pretty small my friend !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

there's something called 'self reliance' my friend !! u cant just always rely on someone else to give u hi-tech stuff !!!! itzz better if you it of ur own .. so that u dont have to send RFPs 'request for proposals' etc etc... round the globe to fulfill ur each and every requirement !!! And...

itz the best time su 30mki gets mlu ....... 12yrs of service... :undecided: :undecided: i think those where the earlier m and mk version... mki came later !!! and the m and mk were updated to mki .... dats what i know ..... u tell ....

to me both EU jets provide more or less the same performance ...... as far as rafale's thrust is concerned .... i had read somewhere that france has offered india to integrate its kaveri engines in rafale.... and considering the fact that mmrca is aint coming any soon .......we got alot of...

mav's have great military applications !! truely agree with IndianArmy ....... they can be so useful in planning in a strike !!!!

hey anyone knows the rcs of jf 17 or tejas ?? does it have any rcs reduction features (jf 17) ??

sorry ......i'll do that

hey anyone knows the rcs of jf 17 ??? has it any rcs reduction features ???