Search results

Come on, even a low-IQ guy like me can tell that after 1992 there was a steady, positive correlation in growth. GDP growth never fell below 4%; compare that to pre-1992. We hit pretty high growth figures before 1992 as well, but those were more isolated figures. The overall trend was much...

Nah, I'll describe you guys anyway I want. If a few Chinese members on PDF can generalize one billion Indians, surely there's nothing wrong in one Indian ascribing a general trait to a few Chinese online warriors.

What does this sentence even mean. Don't overestimate my IQ.

Yeah, they all secretly hate India and are planning to lynch me. :rolleyes: Most Chinese members here are "frogs in the well" as far as their opinions are concerned.

No, I called the Chinese guys on this forum delusional morons. And even here, there are some exceptions. I have enough real life Chinese friends to know the opinions represented here are not representative of Chinese people. If you guys had low IQ like me you would also understand that the...

Also, lol @ below_freezing got banned It's kind of a shame because I remember that he made very good posts when he started out here. But sadly PDF turned him into another India hater.

I don't understand why the high-IQ Chinese guys on this forum generalize one billion people based on what they see on a Defence forum. I'm glad my IQ isn't as high as the Chinese guys here, or else I would generalize all one billion Chinese people as delusional morons.

You know some money is going to be pocketed when you hold a competition for basic trainers. I mean, how hard is it to just choose one of the six and get it over with. Basic trainers aren't fighters; there's so need to meticuluosly analyse and test each one. A trainer is good as long as it...

This was the make-up of the Soviet Air Forces and Air Defense Forces in 1980s: Fighters: 300 Su-27 560 MiG-31 540 MiG-29 560 MiG-25 1550 MiG-23 240 MiG-21 500 Su-15 Ground Attack: 340 Su-25 630 Su-24 530 Su-17 320 Su-7 500 MiG-27 Bombers: 160 Tu-95 15 Tu-160 60 Tu-22M...

I know looks mean nothing in war, but damn that plane has one UGLY nose.

Ah, they all look the same to me, lol. Are the Type 59s still in service? Also, you should gift these Type 62s to Pakistan. They would accept anything.

Are these the same tanks that were used in the Tiananmen protests?

Well, Pakistan imported JF-17 from China, even though China itself is not using it and China imported Flankers from Russia while the JF-17 project was still underway...

Indeed, the submarine arm of the PN poses by far the greatest threat to the IN. This is why the Indian Navy has invested heavily in enhancing ASW capabilities, including shore- (P-8Is and Il-38s), ship- (Talwar and Brahmaputra class frigates), and carrier-based (Ka-28s) assets. It will be...

I left out the JMSDF because they can't use their assets offensively. And that doesn't affect my overall point, which was comparing the Indian Navy's capabilities with the PN.

Do you really think China loves Pak so much that they would hand out their most valuable defence assets to them? I'll be damned when China starts handing out SSBNs and ICBMs like free toys. When Russia let us lease one of their nuclear submarines, it was a major thing. No one had ever done...

SSNs and SSBNs are two different things. Considering India's ASW capabilities (arguably the best in Asia), SSNs are hardly a threat. But SSBNs are a major game changer because they would give Pak second strike capability. That would require a complete change in India's military doctrine.

Actually, yes.

Those aren't a game changer. In naval forces India is already far ahead of Pakistan, and the gap is virtually impossible to close. On the other hand, M-11s are definitely a game changer.

Now this is interesting. What 'high-tech' weapons has China given to Pakistan? Or are you referring to the M-11s? :flame: