Search results

Not out of the question considering they factor autoloaders to handle such shells. Otherwise, why do it? And yes they tested the L55 gun on the Abrams but there were some weight and stabilization issues hence I mentioned having to change the turret and so on. So they decided not to do it...

Cool story any Chinese poster would believe. We already have enough threads on that.

With the gun on Abramsx demonstrator that could be introduce in future Abrams, most like it won't happen. Unless the U.S. Army combines both in terms of length, lighter gun and more powerful gun chamber on it. Depends on the threat of Russian and Chinese tanks. So far we haven't seen the need...

Probably SEP v3 instead of v4. Don't think even Biden knows about the V4 just barely coming out. Unless some Pentagon official decides that order for Biden.

I can see why it would be hard for Iran to try to blockade Israel if it looks like that.

Oh please, Javelins, NLAWs which by the way cost only about 30k along with other anti tank weaponry even Ukraine's own Stugna have had a big impact that not only took out many of Russia's tanks but also other vehicles like troop transport to IFVs to even artillery during ambushes in the early...

The Ukrainians prefer to kill the Russians out in the cold fields of winter and not in the city.

A dollar???

Would have been boring.

HIMARS with GLSDB launch would be almost like air support since they cover all Russian occupied territory except Crimea as JDAM alternative for now... Not to mention able to provide the parts provided from the Sierra depot like gun barrels to tracks to roadwheels, etc. That is surprising...

Who wouldn't want an F-35? But the Ukrainians are realistic and won't ask for that but at least other aircraft like Gripen or F-16s and are able to use them effectively. From HIMARs to artillery to tanks in future. So why not F-16s?

I always think of KKK.

You did a great job. The battle over a burger joint must be your idea. Sure, lets see how they do in Finland.

They fix most of the problems especially the fuel. They put an APU on it to reduce fuel consumption while idle. Its not hard to train on considering its for young troops to learn and fight in.

Whatever.

Uh huh. So a bunch of police officers with Israeli training is the reason for that? But not Rodney King which is similar by getting beat up by a bunch of cops?

Crimea? The Putin's personal bridge? Many others? Didn't the Russians threaten Ukraine with doom and gloom if the bridge is to be touched or Crimea gets hit? The Ukrainian pilots have been flying since the start of the war. Introducing them to a new plane and fly them shouldn't take too...

Doubt it has anything to do with that. We all remember the Rodney King fiasco that led to L.A. riots which led to Rooftop Koreans to defend their property when police couldn't or wouldn't.

Umm the Ukrainians have been able to hit deep into Russia just like for example hitting their strategic bombers. Not to mention the constant attacks in Belgorod. So don't really see the Russians feeling like they are united on the war. Poland and some other countries have provided those...

And let the world besides Ukrainians and Russians see what Putin has done. Russia will never be the same. You mean Russia needs peace negotiations. Engine doesn't need to be modified. It can run any fuel. Previously it was to destroy Ukraine and take it permanently. Now they have to adjust...