^^ Really an excellent thought.... very logical...
But need to add one more thing F-22 is a 2win engine and F-35 is a single engine... secondly technology aspect in F-35 is far more advanced and densely packed compared to F-22. The stealth itself is not reused from F-22 but a new one is tried...
Dude first of all i am not telling who will detect whom first.. i am just mentioning RCS is not a factor for 4++ gen fighters. Even if the RCS in clean config is less, the missiles loaded will shoot the RCS atleast more than 7 m2 depending on the loading.. so enemies no something is beeping on...
which clearly shows every 4th gen plane can detect other 4 th generation plane before it enters the missile no escape zone... so how does a RCS matter now tell me?
Not Sure why every one is talking about RCS of 4+ generation fighter... our neighbour hood doesnt have a stealthy plains inducted.. and it will take atleast 5 yrs to induct and so there will be a gap of only 2 yrs to induct 5th generation fighters.. and PLAAF will not be stupid enough to wage a...
Do you think Britain pressure will work?.. I guess we had tremendous pressure from US compared to britain .. secondly we are not India of 90's to live on aid.. are they making some sense?? what is the aid going to do.. instead put the aid on there own workers..
---------- Post added at 12:17 PM...
The curtains has to laid down for this thread finally.. No we need to open a new thread to discuss Indian Rafale news and discussions :) ... Happy to see we have chosen what we want :)....
Coming back to the Deal where typhoon lost and the news going round it would be unfair for EADS to blame...
just count it wrongly...
but nowerdays i would like to admit that the Quality atleast in Indian section has increased a lot... i am not browsing other sections ... but Mods have done a real good job
Yes this is what i am trying to explain him... as he believes the other way... But Sanctions has helped as a lot... so when we have our own aspiration and when we have to safeguard ourself.. nukes are important.. and we are not a permanent UNSC to do what ever we like.... until then we have to...
I guess this is a misconception here.... All you are taking is RCS in clean configuration.. but when you load something on the body or under the wing.. the RCS increases tremendously .... for (e.g.) the RCS of F-22 was more than 1M2 when it was loaded with a camera under its body during a...
Yes true we have move old days.. but do you know how many labs are still struggling to get the required hardware???? don't think all that glitters are gold... we have come a long way because of sanctions.. and the labs are still complain still there are restrictions..
secondly coming to...
you are wrong dude.. lower RCS != lower RCS.... a 5m2 RCS is enough for taking a radar lock well over 100 KM... and if you add a couple of missile the RCS will be shooting more than 5m2... The Euro Zones except France take decision and will line themselves with US... France is the only country...
Rafale is seriously considered by UAE.. so what do you say about this?.. EFT is not sanction proof.. it will not fly when we test Nukes dude ... but Rafale will fly... Mirages are the perfect example.. they won the war for us
when you put a missile under the wing.. there is no concept called lower RCS... it will blink in enemy's radar at least 70 miles far apart.. dont bring the concept of lower RCS when it is < 5th gen... it is absolutely bullshit..
Rafale is trust worthy.. it is sanction proof.. is it not a...
luckyy's facts are right on bench-marking.. but he believes that the deal will be put off but in reality which will not happen as it will jeopardize india's global image.. may be he is influenced by col ajai shukla ji's article... but in case it happens then it will be F-35 's chance...
May be MoD knowingly included the best & costliest fighters and makes sure that both of them dont come within Benchmark price so that F-35 comes in back..