The populated areas will lie with the respective countries. In this case, Tawang will remain with India and border could be outwards of the Tawang.
Have you read the agreement. I have specifically quoted the Article VII. Please check it.
True, may affect this design. If you look at the big picture, whatever may be the reasons for the failure of satellite functioning, people may not look at these finer details and will affect their thinking before they go to china space agency, when you have so many others in the fray.
The only...
Satish Chandra (who claims himself to be scientist, author and what not) is a stupid from India, who thinks every one should bomb one another and die (to cut long story short).
True, even every space agency. The point here is, China has won the Nigerian satellite contract by quoting a low bid. To make the satellite launch cheap they had to cut corners, and hence this result.
Moreover, when you launch other countries satellites, you have to be extra careful...
What beats me is, when China can do a much more complicated space walking, how can they sc**w up a much more basic satellite launch and especially if you are doing it on a commercial basis.
When it is clearly written that populated areas will be kept away from border disputes and when it is signed by Chinese premier, how can one understand and interpret it differently. This, I don't understand.
You cannot tie all the border disputes to the same pole and say it can be solved the same way china solved its border disputes. Each of the border disputes have their own history, context and geo-politics to it. Current border disputes of India with Pakistan and China involves these elements...
gpit, in the present context, the main contention between India and China is Tawang, which is a populated area.
Article VII of the "Agreement on Political Parameters and Guiding Principles" signed during Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's India visit in April 2005, states: "In reaching a border...