Yeah right :lol:. You are talking as if you know everything about Hindu terrorism. Hindu terrorists being fundamentally extreme nationalistics, why would they do something that damages the image and reputation of India. On the other hand, it is yet to be proven in court about Hindu terrorism...
You should remember that Hindu terrorist would like to kill muslims, why would he go and single out Americans, British and Israelis. Simple logic mate.
There is no Pakistani ID, again you are going by media reports. All the IDs found were of fake Indian IDs. So they were well prepared on that front.
We never know why he wore that, we can keep on speculating that, but there are other evidence to show that pakistani elements were involved in...
He was trying to speak Hindu but couldn't stop his overwhelming punjabi accent and so whatever he spoke was a mish mash. But based on his accent and he claiming to be deccan Hyderabadi, it was clear that he was lying. Elementary my dear friend Elementary.
No, China didn't want to be seen as lone member opposing the deal. It almost rejected it, but Bush called up Hu and twisted his arm to vote for it. With respect to India, China is the biggest hurdle in its rise.
I'm from Hyderabad. I can say what he is talking is not Hyderabadi which is so distinct. And more over Hyderabad is referred as Hyderabad not 'Deccan Hyderabad'. The terrorist was lying, simple.
All your questions will be answered, you have to just wait and have some patience.
Truth serum is not yet administered, it is going to be. So we have to wait till we get some more official information.
This is more official statement as you can see they take the name of the investigation officer. What you might have seen before might be pure media speculation. So, don't weave conspiracy theories around those speculations, believe only official and known sources.
Mumbai police to use truth serum on 'baby-faced' terrorist Azam Amir Kasab
Rhys Blakely, Mumbai
Indian police interrogators are preparing to administer a "truth serum" on the sole Islamic militant captured during last week's terror attacks on Mumbai to settle once and for all the question of...
I don't think so. It has first attacked Afghanistan and then collected evidence. In the case of Iraq, hmmm... no comments. US has always attacked other countries out of conviction and then gathered evidence. I can also give other examples like attack on Libya (for a bomb blast happened in Berlin...