Search results

No soviet tank was made from zero. All were evolutions of the previous. Really? I though that was weight, width, mass, overall volume. Oh, and I did not knew that T-34 was one of those supertanks... By your logic it should... Are you realizing how silly your statement is?. And once you see...

Which was derived from T-64 which was derived from T-54 which was derived from T-34. And this response from your´s to my critic to your way of "comparing" does not follow any logic... LOL, what numbers? I knew what I said because I have seen and I not even looked at those wiki numbers (which...

So the future "bomber" was cancelled? That will leave Russia as the only modern strategic bomber operator post 2020.

?. All tanks evolve from earlier designs. If you look it from that perspective, then the T-90 is just a modification of the old T-34. LOL, how? you are not gonna to convince me, I know and I have seen it. And that argument was pretty f... You should realize, that perspective is playing with...

No they are not. Because it had that gun does not make it any similar. No, you did not . It was: "it gives the principal advantage of the T-95 over the prospective Western project, which will continue to place the ammunition in the turret, which increases its size (projection) compared to...

LOL, those 2 have nothing in common, and are very different. I said that in reference to your comment, which critised the tank´s design by comparing it to that. By your logic, the T-80, T-90 haven´t also "low profile" because the T-55 is smaller. But ofcourse, they are similar, a gun, an...

That has nothing "similar" but looks (not even) and the comparation is not correct.

This specific project is no longer supported by the MOD, though the company will continue with further developement. And in relation to the "next" tank, the Ministry requested to develope a new one with revised characteristics. Here´s part of the interview: "Oleg Sienko: We are working to...

180-200 Km's

I did not said they were using Katyushas (I don´t think they could use a 1940s vehicle btw) I said they use Grad or Katyusha style launchers, locally made mostly or Iranian-Chinese, which are not Grads by themselves, only resembling. And it´s not difficult for a missile to have a good range...

Just a note: there are no "Grads" as such there. What do they have are rough copies or "katyusha like" launchers, either Iranian, Chinese or Irano-Chinese missiles. And most are in fact locally made. And yes, their cost as related to the interceptor system is ridicoulous. But it seems to do...

Russia has already sold S-300 missiles to Venezuela.

There would be no point to build a large carrier fleet. Those 10 carriers in the US were built on the doctrine of "surrounding" the USSR, but they got obsolete for that purpose (too vulnerable to armament) yet prior to the USSR dissapearance, and their purpose was changed to a "world police"...

This? Or what criteria?

I agree, the Leopard should not even be compared to the T-90, neither in cost and effectiveness.

It happened as follows: The F-15 was flying over hostile territory and was shot down with an AA artillery (no SAM). The pilots ejected and an helicopter was sent to rescue them. A crowd of civilians approached to see/salute them, the crew panicked and opened fire. 6 killed or injured. Sad...

Yes, a scientifically/technologically atrassed country like China which gets knowledge mostly from copying, stealing and illegally manufacturing foreign systems progresses more than a strongly developed country as Russia or the European Union, in relatives, but out of that, it's out of...