What is the problem here? At any given point of time minimum of 2 interceptors will be sent to destroy incoming missile. Also it can be launched in salvo mode so the kill probability will be high. And all the tests are bang on target. So I don't understand any logic behind the thinking of "not...
India needs an indigenous missile shield | Deccan Chronicle
India needs an indigenous missile shield
March 20th, 2009
By Arun Kumar Singh
The pro-American lobby is “upset” with President Obama concentrating on US’ primary interests — overcoming the recession, Iraq...
^^
Buddy it is clearly mentioned that the satellite will provide the imagery to us. There is no under table thing here :). But DDM from NDTV are giving an unnecessary spin.
bloody DDM strikes again, we are launching Israel's satellite not acquiring it
The Hindu : Front Page : ISRO gearing up to put Israeli satellite in orbit
CHENNAI: A Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is getting ready to put in orbit Israeli...
The Week
Next: Surveillance radars in space
INTERVIEW/DR V.K. SARASWAT, CHIEF CONTROLLER (MISSILE SYSTEMS), DRDO
The ballistic missile interceptor is Saraswat's latest baby. As DRDO's programme director, he had spearheaded the concept of theatre defence systems and the integration of national...
Discovery of New Microorganisms in the Stratosphere
Three new species of bacteria, which are not found on Earth and which are highly resistant to ultra-violet radiation, have been discovered in the upper stratosphere by Indian scientists. One of the new species has been named as Janibacter...
Well check the Arjun thread the things are looking different now Neo.
Regarding LCA it has been clarified n number of times and still you are coming with the same argument :)
LCA is not waiting for kaveri. The current batch is with GE404IN20 engine next batch will be with whatever engine...
What is this asim? I work in the same industry (I am a telecom guy most of IT companies as my customer). Consultants are invited depending on the project not that it is a phenomena. I don't know how you can shoot such a statement.
You have written what you feel well world does not thinks like...
Ok so you have given the answer the point is any MTCR signatory country can't transfer technology to other country which is not a signatory of MTCR whihc exceeds the range of 300kms but the reverse can not be applied. Now BrahMos tech was given to India where seeker and control software from...
Anoop, just curious what makes you so firmly believe that the range of BrahMos 2 is no more then 300km? Is it just the name BrahMos or something else? Especially when there is no confirmation on the range portion. What makes you so firmly believe that the range can not be more then 300km
Good that you contribute but I have my share of problems with that one time somebody changed the Prithavi page to say India is in possession of more than 10000 of it. Although restored after some time. Any source which can be altered anonymously can not be trusted.
Wikipedia is a source which can be modified by almost any one hence I requested some other links. I know TU 142 are operated by IN so no need for them
Well regarding the pity statement unfortunately IN thinks that it is useful for that duty only. And why they need to use TU 142 for delivering...
Well it's your opinion and you are free to have that.
Well It was malay's opinion no goivernment official has ever siad the BrhaMos II is getting developed specifically for China. Right?