Search results

So you "look down" on people who gave you everything from the numbers you use to Kung Fu (one of the main exports other than cheap products that the Chinese are known for)? Apparently the Chinese have a lot to be proud of: one baseless source that says they have average IQs, itself a...

Come on, there are almost twice the number of Chinese as Indians in the US, and there are still many more Indian Rhodes Scholars. And yeah, the Chinese are good at petty high school math competitions that almost no Indians know about, but not actual math competitions like the Putnam...

Uh, I attend one now, and it's clear that the Chinese students can't compete. Look up the Rhodes Scholars from 2012 (almost half are Indian), and you'll see why I think so. There are a lot of Chinese who are above average at best, almost none who are elite.

Yeah? English is my third language, too. The point is that Caltech wouldn't accept someone without basic reasoning skills. And it's true that some graduate programs have lots of Chinese students, but these students are almost always outperformed by Indians. Lots of Chinese at the middle...

Cal? Surely not Caltech, because you can't even form basic sentences correctly. Anyway, it's the same everywhere. There might be a few more foreign Chinese students in some of the graduate programs, but the Indian students always produce the best work.

Look, there's no need to argue about history with these guys, because more than just history, we have a future. Pakistan will implode (in more ways than one) in 50 years when it's still a poor Islamic dump, with no achievements, and just a couple hundred million savages blowing themselves up...

India has one of the lowest rape rates in the world (1.9), much lower than that of the US (27.3) or of the UK (28.8). In Pakistan they don't even gather rape statistics. I'd imagine they'd be sky high, especially if you include goats.

Why are people even responding to you? All you do is act like a retard every time someone presents you with a fact. The Mughals after a certain point were Mughal in name only and were genetically Rajput. Muslims are only topped by the Chinese in copying things, but at least they're number one...

This is how backwards Pakistan has become: They refer to wives as sex slaves.

It's funny that you mention that, Pakistanis, because Shah Jahan, the most famous Mughal, was was at least 75% Rajput. Both his mother and grandmother (from his father's side) were Rajput.

Fattyacids, go to the MIT (the top engineering school in the world, obviously) Engineering and Computer Science department's page and look at whom they chose as their top alumni. Half of them are Indian and only one is Chinese. Coincidence?

Confucianism? Chinese Remainder theorem? Sun Tzu? Did I leave anything out? And that's like asking why there weren't 100 great ancient river civilizations instead of just four. Your arguments can't get any more childish.

We're not comparing the size of Pakistan with that of India's, just South India's, which is roughly similar. And the study that I remember (I can't post links), shows the people of the Indus Valley Civilization were definitely not Caucasoid, and further lends credence to their being Dravidian...

So, shan, you never addressed what I said, because I'm guessing you found out I'm right. The birth of the IVC preceded immigration from the Caucasus by a full 6000 years. So unless you believe carbon dating is an Indian conspiracy, I'm failing to see how the people of the IVC could have...

You don't seem to understand the meaning of "ancestral." And who is debunking this theory? It's the consensus right now, like I said, from Russian Scholars, to American ones: almost all believe the people of the IVC were Dravidian. In fact, some of the only scholars disputing this are Indian...

Andamanese Islanders split off from South Indians 60,000 years ago. It's like saying Europeans are the same as Africans because they share a common lineage from thousands of years ago. This is like debating with a 5-year-old. Regardless, South Indians are the closest living relatives to the...

My point was that many different people and groups of people have given many different meanings to it. 'Aryan' in the Indian context is not the same as it is in the Iranian one. Aside from having similar spellings and associated sounds, they're not even the same word.

Except India is not a homogeneous country -- far from it. Some Indians are ANI, others ASI. It's the reason we're still much smarter than Pakistanis today.

The term 'Aryan' is next to meaningless now, especially on forums filled with trolls like this one. But yeah, when I say 'Aryan,' I mean the ancestors of modern day North Indians, the founders of Vedic Civilization.

Wait, so no one being able to read the Indus Script is the same as saying no one can find commonalities between it and other languages? If this is you proving you're smart, you're going to have to do a better job.