Search results

In any case, I'm sure the movie wouldn't even have had this much publicity if they didn't react so violently.

Okay, I get it. I'm new here, so I haven't exactly read the constitution.

Freedom of Speech doesn't include freedom to insult religions through hate films does it? If it does, then I really believe it should not. Freedom is all well and good, but limits are needed.

Does that include India in your eyes by the way? I mean, India does share terrorism as a common enemy right?

The fact that media reacts differently to Islamic extremism, and non-Islamic extremism differently, is because of Al-Qaeda. Those fools ruin the name of the entire Islam, and that is the main reason why the media will rant on and on about an Islamic radical, and hardly mention a non-Islamic one.

A question to everyone here. I remember reading somewhere that the GSQR for new rifle asks for several features such as flip-up iron sights, bull-pup configuration, full auto, burst and semi auto firing modes, a 40mm UBGL, and most of all, ability to fire 5.56 NATO, 7.62x39mm, and 6.8 Grendel...

:blink: Your shallowness doesn't surprise me. I'm sure if it happened to be the other way around, of a Muslim propagating anti-Hindu films, you'd just dismiss it as propaganda. :rofl: Doesn't really matter though.

Extremist Hindus are a shame to peaceful Hindus.

Don't fret. India is no good on that count either. :(

Previously there was that report where India spent 1 billion pounds worth on warships, and India replied, "Your 280 million pounds aid is peanuts compared to what we have. Maybe the author is confused. Everyone is confused look at this report: British foreign aid: India tells Britain 'we don't...