Search results

Good. Now please tell me what it means. XP

Congratulations :tup: Now can someone tell me what Islamic Banking is? :)

How would you hate a world with no hate, if there's no hate for you to hate with in the first place. :D

They have done nothing to improve the situation of employment in P0K. In fact though terrorism, they're trying to remove the only employment most Indian Kashmiris get, tourism. So much for caring about the good of Kashmir. No, if Pakistan enslaves the rest of Kashmir, our face will be more...

Found a link that works, but I'm not gonna spend an hour watching it. If you want, tell me specific times where something relevant is mentioned, as the first 10 minutes are just BS, where they criticize India for killing 100 Kashmiris in a riot, right after saying that 4000 security personnel...

You might want to find another link for that. I get the error message saying the uploader has not made it available in my country (Canada).

As far as I remember, no one is tortured. So there... I'm not saying that India Army are angels. But they are far better in keeping the peace than PA.

Never mind, I misinterpreted it.

Nothing happens like IAK as it does in P0K, you're right. There might be a few misinformed shootings and such, but no one is tortured to death. :no: I came up with the story? No, UN did, I simply tried to to paraphrase it for the level of intelligence trolls possess. From the looks of it, I...

Not so fun when the guy you invited to measure my delusions starts measuring yours, is it? :coffee:

Awww.... so PA can start shelling innocent Kashmiris, but when India shells back, it destroys homes? What do you think, PA has smart munitions that identify homes and avoid them? Nope, they destroy many more homes. Also since it's always PA that starts the shelling, the villagers should be...

Oh I surely did. And calling it a few incidents changes nothing, considering the misinformation about the place that comes out from Pakistani crappy media. Idiocity at it's finest. Now it's you who has not read your own link. It's UNs job to be neutral, so it mentions all the factors. These...

Correction, it should P@kistan-occupied-Kashmir. :tup: They have no need to take a neutral stance on an issue where the occupiers torture people in a land they're trying to "free".

14 links = 4-5 incidents? f**k logic. :rofl: It's not our job to go chasing fake incidents on links from jobless fools who have nothing to do other than brainfart. You can find me ONE, and I say it again, ONE U.N. link that criticises India's position in Jammu and Kashmir, and I'll agree that...

When against great, heavenly, just and fair Republic of Pakistan they are allegations only. When against evil, Hindutva, society of Hindu dictators of India it's a proven fact, not an allegations. Selective logic. :rofl:

It's not worth posting ten, when you have one wiki link, which has a link to about 14 sources. :coffee:

Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia All allegations? :rofl: Topic avoidance. :rofl: Don't worry. We all understand how bad trolls feel when they have no links for their BS. Next time, come prepared. :P Then go ahead, get out of your silly cave and post...

Like I said, how does anything in J&K go beyond that? There's Amnesty saying India should investigate the mass graves, and there's Pakistan saying India does this, India does that, and photoshopping the word UN onto our soldiers' blue helmets to make it look like we're pretending. Anything...

Then go ahead, and show us one. :) nice way to dodge the topic of the thread by the way. When Pakistan does something bad, just say India supposedly did something worse. :rofl:

And I suppose the AHRC becomes an unreliable, Indian source when it mentions Pakistan in a bad light?