Search results

please dont forget to add outright communal elements like the razakar remnant mim, illegal bangladeshi supporting aiudf, indian version of the party responsible for partition iuml etc in the "secular" coalition...:cheers: that means you dont know the politics of india..... as long as there...

care to tell me who is abhijit mukherjee...? btw if you want the truth...there are many states with dynasties that have done well than bengal with no dynasties... the congi leadership during 50s and 60s were the remnants of the freedom struggle and hence the dynastic problem was not...

thanks man..did not know that till now coz i never really cared for that iqbal dude...but i'll hate him from now on, atleast to make what you said the truth...:)

one more partition thread.....one more day in pdf.....yawn

the point is no one has the proof...and recen genetic studies have conclusively proved the absence of any distinct race called aryans...im merely poking holes into your claims...im the skeptic here...and it is you who has to convince me beyond doubt that your hypothesis is the fact...got it ...

the only linguistic proof you claim is the rig veda..and the claims are so anachronistic that one who really knew it would have this "evidence" with a truck load of salt..... i remember a very good post by another poster Bang Galore regarding the contradictions/anachronism in the the dating if...

thanks to joe shearer this has become another race thread...

there were no invaders called aryans....:hitwall: i can understand the pakistani mouthing off...after all they are also the people who claim they are the scions of indus vallye civilization..not knowing that had there been an aryan invasion, then the harappans fled them into mainland india and...

same can be said for brahmos or mki or even the nuke sub akula.... believe me...you pakistanis excel in that...all the babur, abdali, gauri missiles, al-khalid tanks stand testament to that...:-)

Yes there was and afaik the muslim league won every single muslim majority constituency.....not 100% of the muslims need to agree...if the majority agree then all would need to abide by it....isn that the essence of democracy...? for example did congress win every single of the votes polled for...

why would the arrival of chariots or horses be indicative of an invasion...why cant they be ancient day technology transfers between two civilizations ? did russia invade us and give us our brahmos ? and no there has been no conclusive archaelogical evidence of ait and the chronology of the rig...

ok..i'll rephrase that question...the decision not to take partition to its logical extension...

so do you say prithviraj never won the first battle of tarain and he never let go of ghauri...?

fine...but pardon me for persisting with this....still I am not convinced how this objective of yours would have come to a nought if partition had been taken to its logical extension....atleast then the muhajirs would be in a position to keep the punjabis in check...:lol:

i thought the arrival/invasion/migration/whatever of aryan tribes are still in the stage of hypothesis and not promoted to as facts..so i would reserve my judgement on that.....

so what if we vindicated it...except some brownie points to pak what else would have been our loss...? i find this line of argument of some indians honestly pointless...many say two nation theory failed with the separation of pakistan...but actually it did not.....only if BD had joind with india...

true.....but wont you agree that in 1947 we had the opportunity to turn around all those turning points in one single,big move ??? a move that was let go for 'n' number of reasons.....

Nice post. actually this line caught my attention.....by this narrative wasn't the decision not to agree to population transfer in 1947 the greatest turning point ???......here we had a chance...a chance after almost 800 years.....to reverse the history....and begin afresh.....but that...

bro its not all about yudh dharm...the steppe nomads who fought war as a tool of survival naturally had the barbarity embedded in them..and also since war to them was a means of survival they took care to keep them updated with the latest weapons from different cultures, innovative war tactics...