Search results

It is a member of the Tibeto-Burman language family, which is a subfamily of the Sino-Tibetan family of languages. The language uses the Burmese script, derived from the Old Mon script and ultimately from the Brāhmī script.

Correction: Naga is derived from a burmese word

As long as better sense will prevail, there would be no war and unnecessary loss of lives on both sides. China has bigger issues to deal with. Anyway, i am off for dinner. Will see you guys after some time.

If India starts a war, the whole country would suffer. Think over it. Indian leaders ought to be pragmatic. Ego shouldn't come in way of an everlasting and perpetual peace. BTW< the very same Indian govt, whose stands you are quoting, doesn't recognise the Tibetan government in exile and...

That was due to the 50 years peace deal. If China broke it it would have lost face internationally and that was a time China was working to get where it is today. Arunachal was not a big issue for them. BTW, they did some misadventures in the 80s and were "beaten" back effectively.

Well, Aksai Chin is not under Indian control. So let go of it. Trade it for peace and an end to bogus Chinese claims on Arunachal and fully legitimate territory of India.

Bricks and stones might have been left in the Pakistani side, but the culture of that once great civilization is alive in India. Don't pakistanis pride themselves for their islamic heritage? and wasn't it advent of islam that erased any signs of IVC culture in Pakistan?

Faith and reality are two different things. Reality is China is stronger than India. In the battlefield it would be strategy that would count as both sides won't be able to field much weaponry and it would be a gruesome artillery and infantry battle.

Sorry for that. Heat of emotion. I apologise. I once saw a stone marker in tawang, erected by Chinese. It marked distance of Lhasa, Shigatse, Beijing and a few other cities from tawang. and i pass a lot of army barracks while going home, as a matter of fact i was born in an army camp : dahung...

The govt. says a lot of things. We should not take all of it at face value.

Rest of India has nothing much to lose. We lose our lands and people to an oppressive communist regime. So sorry, i can never support such a meaningless war.

That reminds me of a guy with a toothbrush moustache. Haha Aryans my @$$.

Aksai Chin is long gone and we can't get it back. Better sense should prevail.

Indian airforce and civilian choppers do use Bhutanese airspace. and a pact is what the locals are pressing for. Village headmen of all villages in Tawang have sent a written request to the Bhutanese government. We don't need connectivity in times of wartime. A lot many soldiers die as result...

Am i eligible for it?

We have started stamping visas official maps of india on those passports. That is good enough. And, India can't match China. We are well capable to defend our positions but we cannot mount an offensive into the Chinese held regions. Many times people say that the Chinese side is well...

India has to permanently base soldiers in the border. The road connectivity is as bad as it can be. Our elders have written to the Bhutanese and Indian authorities to open road to tawang via Bhutan. That would be beneficial to the civilians as well as the Indian army. It takes the Indian army...

post some pictures guys.

That would be good. But doesn't the referendum needs Pakistan to move out it forces first and also the pandits need to be a part of that referendum. Also does that extend to Ladakh and Jammu?

You showed it all your official maps. Who was stopping you then?