Search results

You really are bad in history right?

The Chinese want to keep the tibetans under their influence, hence the sops. The tibetans are quite warsome, but owing to relgigion and the dictum of dalai lama not to indulge in non-violence and follow a middle path have kept the tibetans from staging an armed rebellion. Though they did in the...

Peace is always good. There is no such thing as bad peace. Anything that brings peace is welcome

Religion and politics are two different things. Does Vatican plans to annex all the Catholic countries cuz they show solidarity to it's ideology? Does Saudi Arabia plans to annex the entire muslim sphere cuz they share the same religion? Your logic here doesn't hold any ground. For us, Dalai...

i could also not say whether they were there. There are no conclusive proofs.

No i didn't. I said even if they were there.... i wrote is in place of if in the post you quoted

i wonder whatever you say about India, based on your distorted views of south asian history, holds for the bangaldeshis and the pakistanis too. Wonder what they have to say in this regard.

So what is Aryans were there in Tibet? Aren't Arabs scattered all over west asia? Does Saudi Arabia goes saying : Lebanon is ours, egypt is ours, Jordans is ours?? British left the region, partitioned the territory under direct control of the crown and gave the autonomous princely states the...

QFT, India didn't surrendered never was there any order of surrender. It may be that some soldiers were taken PoWs but the IA didn't surrendered. But then, they didn't put much of a fight in the eastern sector

Wz-10 is a unproven piece of tech. It maybe potent but you cannot say it is at p0ar with AH-64. There are far better and proven attack helicopters than the Wz-10

The same can be said for India. Majority of Indians never surrendered their culture and heritage inspite of almost 1000 years of foreign rule. BTW, the mughals you say, they came and defeated a muslim sultanate, i wonder why people keep saying 500 years of mughal rule when they were the one...

This makes me wanna troll. But i will refrain. Indo-Iran ties are not what they used to be.

I suggest you do some research before commenting on history here. Your allies in south asia would take offence in what you wrote.

I didn't said Myanmar got the weapon this way. I said some insurgents might have raided the outposts of secutiry forces (IA/paramilitary) like the Maoists raid the posts of state police.

If we start taking each and every person who served in uniform for granted then we will end up living in a world which hates itself. I don't know his motive, but he got his history wrong. He is a soldier not a historian.

and what do Maoists have to do anything with the IA or the NE or Myanmar?

Raids on Indian posts perhaps. The Maoists and the insurgents do it sometime.

and China was wise enough to utilise that period of friendship with America. India can do that too though i doubt we'd be as successful as China was. We got a lethargic government.

It is an internationally recognized disputed territory. Recognised by none other than UN of which your country is a permanent member.

Let the Chinese think whatever they want. Just because Bhutan is improving ties with China doesn't mean that they hate India. By this logic, all countries which have cordial and open relationship with China hate India. do they even know Bhutan will open roads for Indian army so that troops...