Search results

It wont be beneficial, but its one of those scenarios where we have nothing to lose as compared to the other side. No winners in war, only losers

I agree, going to war would be beneficial for us and would send India back couple of decades. They can give up their hope of becoming power giant in Asia if they war us. How would you classify the mindset of India media??

Russia and USA, India's best best friends and suppliers said the exact same thing...

War drums are being rung on the Indian side only, Pakistan army is not advocating war or strikes unlike Indian army guys on Times now or NDTV

Did you built yourself a nuke bunker as well, you'll need one. We will nuke the likes of nuke, just for the fun of it :chilli:

Two front war BS. You cant even take on Pakistan by yourself :chilli: (this comment is only meant for this user since he does not believe in peace)

Ha! you war mongers! India is not at war with Pakistan, only the Indian media is. They are beating the drums to attract more audience to their channels. Watch it fizzle out in a few days...

I just saw reports from Times Now and NDTV and was actually surprised to see the hype created by the Indian Media. If it were for them we would already be at war. But unfortunately saner heads prevail and here we are discussing defense and politics and not ripping each other to shreds... Yes...

@batmannow MQM backed off hahahahaha

Pure nonsense. Pure propaganda.

It would have been a mistake if US was at its prime. But its a wounded superpower now, with too many threads and pressure points in middle east. It would suffer a major blow if Pak goes against it... lets just agree to disagree. Its kind of late and i have to sleep. We'll continue the discussion...

US would be short on weapons and supplies in Afghanistan since its land locked. It wont be able to withstand the blockade. Russian side isnt very pro US either. It would need supplies for its troops in Afghanistan who will be constantly under attack by taliban. The price tag on the supplies...

All of these groups are already being supplied, so its not something new. All their weapons come from Karachi port, if the supplies get blocked, that would be the end of it. They cant impose sanctions on useless basis or even if they try, we can get China to veto it. Yes they can block loans...

I would differ, i think we have reached a point where US cant inflict any serious damage. We on the other hand have major potential to cause harm, whether it be supply lines, support for afghan taliban, blue on green attacks, you name it (not saying we should do it, but the potential is...

Sir but our country is already destabilized. Karachi burns everyday with shootings, waziristan is being droned, blasts in quetta, war in fata, floods in sindh. I think we have been saturated enough that US is out of options except for a few blasts here and there....

BLA is funded and supplied by India, but the one calling the shots is CIA. Do you remember the arrest of Shazain Bughti, the first thing he did was call US embassy for help. Sure, all these agencies may be there but i still see the main culprit as CIA

The same amount could be delivered to Afghan Taliban to return the favor via land. Since they are also drawing down, they will be more vulnerable than any other time in this conflict

Good analysis, but i would like to add one thing. I think in this one, RAW was assisted by CIA assets on the ground. Sure, RAW may have funded it but the assets were definitely CIA.

I did read your post but US is just as vulnerable as we are. If they take revenge, we can easily strike them back, not directly, but indirectly

You are wrong my friend. Compare the number of terrorist attacks that took place when the supplies were blocked as compared to the ones after they were reopened. The explosive material that ends up with terrorists comes from Karachi Port, whether it be RAW calling the shots or CIA.