Search results

I have already posted it here. http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistans-war/28421-pakistani-military-facing-tougher-fight-northwest-than-reported-2.html#post410761

Good piece Ratus.

We know those idiotic theories of his. I find a striking similarity between the thinking processes of Zaid Hamid & Hamid Gul.

I am just quoting that US was accusing Gen Taj of being a double dealer. And they were also accusing that couple of his deputies were supporting Gen Taj in whatever he was doing. (Probably they were just obeying their boss.) I don't know on what grounds US was making the allegations or if any...

To start with, Gen Akhtar Abdur Rahman & Lt Gen Javed Nasir. Both helped Mujahidin in Afghanistan with whatever they could. It was after Nasir's tenure that Taliban took the form of what it is today, thanks to Nasir. After that, General Mahmud Ahmed has always resisted US presence in...

That goes for all the strategic relationships on the planet. They ought to be mutually beneficial. Unlike your strategies of supporting Taliban in Afghanistan. They were beneficial only for Pakistan, Afghanis got Taliban regime in return. Because India was a socialist regime back then, why are...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/world/asia/28swat.html?_r=2&hp Taliban Losses Are No Sure Gain for Pakistanis MARDAN, Pakistan — For the past month and a half, the Pakistani military has claimed success in retaking the Swat Valley from the Taliban, clawing back its own territory from...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ed601036-5f54-11de-93d1-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=a6dfcf08-9c79-11da-8762-0000779e2340.html India eyes huge rise in road building :yahoo: By Joe Leahy in Mumbai Published: June 22 2009 19:02 | Last updated: June 22 2009 19:02 India’s Congress party-led coalition...

Hard to pin point. There are so many of them.

I think that depends on the nature of pact between the countries, India & Tajikistan here. I have read somewhere that as long as all parties are informed, Pakistan can not accuse Tajikistan & Afghanistan of waging war against it. But the converse is otherwise. If you attack that base in...

And besides, I don't know what privacy is going to be achieved by shifting to Pakistani servers. The forum is still public & everyone can access from any corner of the world.

This has more to do with their acquisition of Jaguar in UK & not much with Indian markets. The acquisition was just ill-fated & ill-timed. So even with Nano doing extremely well in India, the UK branch has had to suffer considerable loss, leading to net loss for the company.

Is it so hard to understand that export driven economy like China was sure to suffer considerably more than India? You brag about 75K job losses in India. China has suffered multiple times. You have lost 20 million jobs. And this figure accounts only for migrant workers. Other sections not...

:lol: No. Mangalore is about 400 KM West of Bangalore & is a sea port. It is quite famous for its beaches & scenery.

Now why are you interested in this article? It only debunks your theories that India is spreading terrorism in Pakistan thru Afghanistan. It explains how India is involved in development work there & how it is winning support among the locals, except religious hardliners. OTOH, it opposes any...

Thanks for the article. It was a good read. I guess its time to construct similar bases in Kabul, Jalalabad etc. Why not leverage the excellent relations with Afghanistan?

And I may suggest that you misunderstood it a bit. ward off any external threat to the country's security IMO refers to threat to India's security, not Tajikistan's. And the answer to at least one of your questions is HELL YES. They are going to allow use of their territory to India in case...

Now that was really a stupid argument to make. Muslim Taliban used Muslim suicide bombers to kill Muslim soldiers in Muslim dominant Pakistan Kashmir. Yet you claim that everything was orchestrated by 'Hindu forces'?

I don't think so. Firstly, you have no evidence of Indian involvement. If at all there is, most of Pakistani members here support terrorism in 'disputed territories'. If Kashmir is disputed, Pakistani Kashmir is also disputed. And by your own definitions, India has full right to support the...

Probably. But by whom?