Search results

Aryan-Dravidian theory regarding language and linguistic families...NOT races. Genetic evidences have proved that there was NO Aryan race or their intermingling with the native Indian race for the last 40,000 years. Neuro, westerners AIT kondu varadhukku oru mukkiya karanam, namma madhathayum...

To say that the Army is going to be afraid of Imran Khan given past history is highly highly misleading.

Looks like he is not going to be the first leader. He did not even enter SW, let alone go to NW. I'm sorry, wasnt the objective to enter North Waziristan, show the world that there were no terrorists, all is well over there and prove that the drones are only killing civilians ? How did any of...

There is a reason why its called Sindhu-desh and not Sindhu-stan or Sindh-abad. ;)

Does my avatar ring any bells ? ;)

Lol it was always a sectarian hate war with the Sunnis outside Syria unable to see a Kuffar (according to them) ruling over the population.

Another thread with a very useful much needed message hijacked by insecure Pakistanis. :disagree: Ticker you dont know this history, you dont know English. Why getting worked up over silly things when the article has so much more to say? FYI, Gupta empire never included part of Iran, Central...

Again instead of trying to answer the question put forth about the gaping holes in the AIT, all we get is stupid, irrelevant strawman arguments totally unrelated to it. Your interpretation of how Hinduism characterizes idols is wrong. Ok let me as ask you another ~ you say Allah is...

Did Americans really invade you to give their F-16s ? Why not the chariot could have been a simple item of trade between neighboring communities ? No you dont have an answer to that. You "assume" ( amighty big assumption) that chariots were introduced only through invasions. WRONG. Once again...

People who missed out the arguments about the untenability of AIT and the numerous questions for which it has no answer in another thread can read it: http://www.defence.pk/forums/central-south-asia/207393-any-questions-regarding-india-40.html#post3430800

Linguistics unless supported by archaelogical proof is simply not enough. Period. No genetics proved that there existed no separate race called "Aryans". And the genetic markers of people in India are different from those who live in the places considered to be the originating place of Aryans...

There existed a 6 lane flyover straight from Khyber pass to the Wagah border which the Aryans took to bypass the "ancestors of the Pakistanis who built Harappa" and directly invade India. True story bro

You need training in English. Honestly. Your reading and the interpreted meaning is wrong. Go read it again.

Hmmm no. The epics like Mahabharatha mention the Pandya kings fighting on behalf of the Pandavas... Again people should not conflate the Indo-Aryan vs Dravidian language system with races. There was and there is a Indo-Aryan language system but there never was an Aryan race or a Dravidian...

No there is no "overwhelming" evidence...all the "evidence" has been debunked long back after extensive genetic studies. Moreover anywhere in the world History is written after examining archaelogical proof and not solely on linguistic basis. The Aryan Invasion theory is based solely on an...

There was no Invasion...for god sakes. And if there was indeed an invasion then that punctures holes into the deary belief of many Pakistanis that they are the scions of the Indus Valley Civilization.

No. This was the only line with a vague reference to IVC NO where does the author imply that India is the sole inheritor of that legacy. He just says where the name "India" came from. Please dont be so insecure.

Tamerlane was a Turk..not a Mongol. His tribe was originally mongol but was Turkified. And please dont insult Mongols..I'm a fan of them...:cry:

One more thing all these Swamis, babas, gurus and Hindu websites that advertise Hinduism as only comprising peace, tolerance, realization of inner self must also include one of the most important and most neglected aspect of Hinduism ~ duty to fight, if necessarily the violent way, the adharmic...

Well I have mixed feelings about this article. Basically the author has super-exaggerated the defeatist attitude to make a very valid point. So I will stop short of nitpicking the exaggerations. The point is "ahimsa" or "pacifism" as we know now, and what many regard as virtues are outdated...