Search results

**** morals. .

What makes you think India would come to the negotiation table without the mujaheddin not receding back ? What if India repeats a 1965 ? That is, to relieve the pressure on the Kargil front, opens new front all along from Punjab to Gujarat across the international border ?

Mumbai is dangerous than Karachi.. ? Lol that is some fine Afghan charas smuggled into Karachi by the Pathans speaking.

I was talking about the history books in school. Not every one is a historian. But almost everyone reads the NCERT books in school. So it is at this level that students must be introduced to the famous kings from India. Not just the Delhi Sultanates,Mughal rule and Marathas to a lesser extent...

You would make a good politician. No it aint. Can you explain the foreign content of Hinduism or Buddhism..I mean well established facts and not theories ? True. But they are still not invalid. You dont have to be born a Hindu to be a Hindu.

Happens everytime when a faith comes into contact with another radically opposite to that. Why ? Just to maintain the difference.

If AMU goes ahead and bans facebook, as they threatened some time back, perhaps that should also be included..:D

Hmm..that is a very wrong example. Sati was practised only in Rajasthan, mostly by the Rajputs and in Bengal, or that is what I am aware of -- for different reasons though. What about UP,Bihar, Deccan etc ?

Not all areas are affected by the imprint left by the invasions. I dont love Tipu Sultan. Maybe I'm indifferent. If you know anything about his atrocities on the Hindus and Christians of Malabar and Coast you would not talk like this. The producers at DD should be put to the firing squad for...

Ah gaya maulvi saab...:lol: Take pride in Muhammed Ghori...:blink:

That is a hypothesis and not a fact.

No...conversions happen and are valid. This delusional thinking by the Brahmins was what impeded the growth of Hinduism in the intitial times, along with the ridiculous notion of not crossing the oceans. * Hoping you are not a Brahmin* :D

Unless Mecca and Madina were part of the Indian subcontinent, Islam was indeed alien to this part of the world and unless due to some tectonic shift they become part of the subcontnent, they will be alien. Think it about it - Was the language of the Prophet an Indian one ? Were the epic battles...

Can you fault us for remembering ?

Is this the justification you guys invent for working under foreign invaders ? But I agree with you - the invaders were here for many purposes - looting, killing, rapine and also for spreading Islam.

I dont think there was anything particularly proud in fighting somebody else's war under orders from foreign masters. There was nothing to be proud of in saying Ji Alanpanah and giving your life to some Afghan or Turco-Mongol..:no: Now I get the reason why the Afghans scorn you Pakistani...

Well to be fair to Pakistanis, not all of them can be said to be having Indian culture....the regions that comprise Pakistan now was the playground for various invaders over the centuries and hence Pakistanis have a little bit of everything - Indian, Arab, Persian, Turkic and even some Greek...:)

Maybe out of poverty man. But some tribes there cook it as a delicacy..Anyway...culinary tastes differ from region to region.

Masallah...:)

Well then you did a very bad job. Not considering that fact you needed a Turko-Mongol dynasty to give you the platform. Still they were the rulers and you - like the rest of us - were just subjects. Actually I wasn't even a subject. Our places were never under Mughal rule.