Yup, we did take external help. Your point being? If you are trying to equate Pakistan's contribution to the JF-17, and Indian contribution to the Tejas, then give up.
Yea, the same way ALL missiles own their existance to the V2, not just Agni.
However on the other hand, ALL fighters are not derived from MiG-21 project. Only your JF-17 is derived from a 60 year old jet.
I know. Fact is JF-17 would have never existed without Super-7 project, and Super-7 would not have existed if MiG-21 didn't exist. Super-7 is the father and MiG-21 is the grand father of JF-17. They are too closely knit and part of the same evolutionary tree as you can see below.
Super-7 project was instrumental in development of the JF-17. Like the wing shape for example. If Super-7 project didn't exist, then JF-17 would have never taken to the skies with the meagre funds PAF gave to jump start the project again. And we all know where Super-7 came from. Hell even...
Be happy with MiG-21's grandson. PAF is only good enough for that.
I love JF-17. It is the circus clown among the fighters. You never get bored while discussing JF-17. Very entertaining jet. :lol:
Now people daily has made a mistake. Everyone is making a mistake and JF-17 fanboys are correct. :lol:
Retiring it with MiG-21 offshoots ofcourse. :lol:
Russians are really awesome to have made a fighter which can be modified and changed to THIS extent. *Salutes*
If it is photoshpped post the real pic. :lol: Where is the real pic??? In your wet dreams?? :lol:
That is a popular one of the first pics of JF-17.
No, we are retiring our MiG-21s while you are inducting brand new Mig-21 offshoots which will become your flying coffin after they get old. :lol...
Which is why it is still not inducted brainiac. :lol: While PAF is happy with a fighter IAF would have spat on. :lol:
Photoshopped and fake? hahahaha! Is that the best defence you can come up with. :lol: That pic was one of the first pics to come out of JF-17 called super-7 then. Some...
Your Thaandar is a pice of crap by IAF standards. IAF would have cancelled the JF-17 project long ago if ADA and HAL ever came up with it. JF-17 is lucky it got adopted by an impoverised airforce like the PAF. :lol:
I wonder what is that "Super-7" label doing on the JF-17. :lol: All they did was change name from Super-7 to FC-1 and JF-17. So many names for a CHEAP fighter.
And please post an evolutionary chart from Marut to LCA. dummkopf :lol:
I bet if Su-15 got a better radar and if it had gotten a mid life upgrade with latest Avionics, it would kick the grand son of MiG-21, the JF-17, out of the sky.
Sukhoi-11 and Sukhoi-15 rules!! :D
Yea, JF-17 was developed from F-22 Raptor. JF-17 has got nothing to do with MiG-21. :lol:
JF-17 is more than 50 years old! Even older than LCA. :lol: JF-17 is an offshoot of a 2nd generation 1950s MiG-21 aircraft. :lol:
No no.. Junk Fighter is a popular term. it even appears on google suggestions. :lol: Check it out. It is Hilarius!!
Type "junk figh" and see it display "Junk Fighter-17" in the suggestions!! :lol: :lol: :lol: Your JF-17 is popular for the wrong reasons. :lol:
If you are going to include the preliminary idea which originated from 1980 and add 30 years, then what abut JF-17 which was first conceived in 1960's as a MiG-21, then got gradually developed to JF-17? :lol: That's more than 50 years old. Chinese can do some crazy reverse engineering and...
Shuld I spell is out what JF-17 is known outside pakistani forums? Junk Fighter - 17! :lol:
He said that because LCA has still not integrated with MRAAM weapons and other guided munitions. It is a MiG-21++ fighter even in development. JF-17 is a CHEAP fighter when it is operational in PAF. PAF...
IF PAF had enough money they would have gone for J-10s as a secondary fighter then either Eurofighter or Rafale as the Primary one in a LOW-High combo. But now they have to be "Happy" with JF-17. Too bad.