Just pointing out the hypocrisy.
You seem to be missing bits from your timetable of events.
The kashmirs wanted to join pakitsan and when the maharaja dithered there was a uprising by regiments in Gilgit.The maharaja got scared and called for indian help with the indian willing to help only...
I have no idea what you are talking about.
A lot of countries do that......countries without the same amount of money as the saudis probably do more.
I have been to "saudi" and i have no hatred for the people or any people, its the govt that i dont like.Just like i dont like the pak...
so they in there barracks during 47-65......."Cant you use your mind"?
The same reason the muslim where killed........what about the actual rape of thousand of kashmiri woman by the indian army and not just a threat(which i dont even believe).
Well they have a choice of either living in...
Good old indian propaganda... "Mulla Radio (Madarsa) started announcing rape of Hindu women".......you rigged the elections in kashmir and then shoot dead unarmed protesters that led to the uprising which opened a door for pakistan who wanted payback for bangladesh.
Its of you all making.
Well...
The point you made before all hinged on being paid,once it was pointed out to you that indian soliders dont fight for free you you want to change the bar.
A solider of fortune will fight anybody and anywhere for money ,the freedom fighters dont .
If its the uniform that they dont wear that...
If where going off the yardstick that a single man(maharaja) can choose who his nation goes to then you must also accept that Junagrah should be part of paskistan......it had a muslim ruler with a majority hindu population who joined pakistan but the indian army invaded.
Why would a hindu...
In the real sense the kashmiri uprising began in the late 80s early 90s and that also without pakistani help which only came after in the mid 90s.
In a sense the kashmiris where also "forced" into taking arms once the indian security forces started opening fire on demonstrators and quashing all...
I bet you dont take the same line when it comes to the kashmiri fighters......that the majority of the stories you hear are untrue and state propaganda....yaeh theres are few bad apples in the fighters but the majority are okay?
Just excuse the excess.
You keep forgetting that the muslims of...
Fair enough.
Well if you really want to know my family is from kashmir both sides of the LOC.
You seem not to want to discuss anything put a narrow agenda of what the hindu kashmiris think without putting it into context.
Yeah the kashmiri hindus suffered violence at the hands of fighters the...
100% pakistan backs the freedom fight with weapons and men and am pretty they will carry on doing so for as long as kashmir is under occupation....just like you india backed hindu groups (LTTE) and what about the Mukti Bahini?
Whats there to mask?
Ooh so the indian army doesnt get paid?...they...
Its all a matter of perception.
1.Kashmiris dont class themselves as indian and see you as an occupation force.....so when you talk of " activities which hurt my country" i agree but it does not cover the kashmiris as they are not indian and thus not countrymen.
2.When you say "outsiders who...
indushekMy god i never knew the exact horrors faced by KP's, have you watched the video my blood was boiling when i was hearing about the women being targetted. I had to go out and smoke for few min before coming to normal mind.
So in other words you didnt!!!
Dont stop using phrases like...
The kashmiri hindus have lived with muslims for ages and they dont really have that much of a problem.
I dont reacall the kashmiri muslim-hindu community killing each other on mass during partition or during any of the wars between Pak-ind.
Coming from an indian that statement is laughable
What ever has happened to the kashmiri pundits is bad but its no different to that off the kashmiri muslims .
If you had the same reaction when it comes to kashmiri muslims.
More then i can say for you.
Nowhere do i mention the muslims will be destroyed....only weakened to such an extent that they will be toothless against aggression
Well more like your ignorance and people like you that will make it easy for the enemies to subdue the muslims using proxy's like...
Of all the people the west could have backed to take power from the shah of Iran it was Khomenei that they backed on the sole purpose of getting the sunni-shias to fight.The sunni states got paranoid about the allegiances of there shia citizens and and Khomenei rhetoric about a greater shia...