Search results

Yes I agree but also, consider that China added a lot more during it's period at India's level. How else did China surpass India in the 90's and continuously become even larger? Same size in the 90's, 2x the size in the 2000's, and now 5x the size in the early 2010's.

Is there any confirmation for the actual displacement/tonnage for the Type 055 or is it just a bunch of hype. I heard 10,000 t and others say 12,000 t How many do you think will be produced? If it's at that level than it's larger than anything the US has produced, other than our Zumwalts which...

Lets be objective. From 2010 - 2011, India added $172 billion From 2009 - 2010, India added it's largest amount in history, some $340 billion From 2008 - 2009, India added $140 billion From 2007 - 2008, India lost -$15 billion From 2006 - 2007, India added $288 billion From 2005 - 2006...

Estimates are highly inaccurate. They do not take into account currency appreciation or deprecation. Hence, China's numbers are always undervalued in estimates (for example last year China's GDP in 2013 was supposed to be $8.9 trillion but it ended up $9.4 trillion) and India's numbers may be...

Ok first of all 1990 was a year before the collapse of the Soviet Union. You chose the worst year to compare metrics. As I said, during the 70's and 80's Russia was at almost 1/2 the size of the US but also spending 25% of it's GDP on the military. It was outspending America 4 or even 5 to 1...

If China was adding an entire Russia in terms of military and diplomatic power then China would have 1,000 destroyers by now and control all of Asia as satellite states. I was only referring to GDP. Raw numbers.

China cannot completely take advantage of it's financial power until it liberalizes it's banking system. As for technological sophistication, this is both a mix of GDP per capita and GDP. India has a larger GDP than Sweden, but who is more of a technological power? China's GDP per capita is...

Russia's strengths that are not accounted for in their nominal GDP exist only because of their past nominal GDP. Throughout the 70's and 80's Russia's GDP reached over half the US, and at one point reached 65% of the United States. Russia's large amount of military equipment and large amount of...

I dont know why Indian's always do this. Making a comparison is not mocking. The title of the thread and the majority focus was on Russia because it has a larger GDP, but somehow you brought the mockery of India into this. The only reason I made a comparison with India is because analysts are...

I'm not d!ck measuring just making an observation. Yes, I know it was due to the depreciation of the rupee. It still happened though. GDP is calculated with US dollars, and on a US dollar basis this is accurate. If you have a problem you should take it up with the IMF and World Bank, not me...

What I find particularly funny is this desperate attempt by many an "analyst" to throw India and China into the same grouping every time 'emerging economies' are mentioned, as if they have had anywhere near the same performance. India for the same time period: India GDP (nominal), 2010: $1.709...

China GDP (nominal), 2010: $5.945 trillion China GDP (nominal), 2011: $7.314 trillion China GDP (nominal), 2012: $8.387 trillion China GDP (nominal), 2013: $9.469 trillion (Figures exclude Hong Kong, Macau, or Taiwan) China grew by $1.369 trillion between 2010 and 2011, $1.073 trillion...

ANNNNNNNDDDDD BANNED! Haha

"Chinese in you to reply..." More of that good ole' Indian laziness. I'm sorry you find us so superior that pretending like I have slant-eyes somehow makes my insults less demeaning.... your inferiority complex is not my concern. Good bye!

Go on, keep repeating yourself - I hope you enjoyed writing that pointless diatribe for no one you dumb poop stick.

I don't have to pretend to be something I innately am. You have provided no proof to the contrary, yet you have continued to repeat your obsession with finding out my race for the last 6 months or so. It reveals the identity crisis and serious personality disorders you have, but reveals nothing...

Poooop! Haha, I don't actually care, I just wanted to put you in your [little] box. Anyway, it's a known fact that Europeans are the tallest. Indians are even shorter than the already-short East Asians. How does that make you feel? Knowing that even they consider you midgets? ;)

I firmly believe that the only thing Europeans have more in common with Indians than we do East Asians are the shape of our eyelids. That's about it. Everything else, from body odor to height, and from skin color to intellect, is much more in-line with East Asians than with Indians. There are...

Ok I'll be the moderator! East Asians are known for their European nose jobs... Do you readily admit that Indians are bleaching their skin to look like Europeans?

The average Indian male is some 3 inches smaller than the average Nordic female. Now THAT is embarrassing! Indians are midgets even compared to East Asian midgets. That's the only fact I was propagating here poop skin.