Search results

All in-laws are +5% :)

Then you've noticed one of the most annoying things with scientific publishing... the constant and consistent contradictions inherent in early discovery. Many studies reveal no Neanderthal genes while many do. The consensus today (despite the occasional contradictory finding) is that all...

The word Aryan is not used in scientific circles. It's only used in the word "Indo-Aryan". I'm not sure why you are centering your argument on the use of the term "Aryan", but it's wholly irrelevant to the topic. ANI has a lot of Caucasoid influence (originating from the Eastern European PIE...

I will point this out again. The great majority of historians, archaeologists, geneticists, anthropologists, and linguists agree with me. Virtually no one other than self-proclaimed Hindu nationalists agrees with you. Kindly move away from the ad hominem excuses that you use to avoid...

I'm referring to how your ancestors are irrelevant to the discussion. Telling me that it's the same for my ancestors doesn't change the fact that historians, archaeologists, geneticists, anthropologists, linguists all agree with me. What is the relevance of referring to my ancestors? LOL

India was primarily Dravidian; the Indo-Aryans descended from Central Asia to colonize the subcontinent. They came from Eastern Europe and were White. Kurgan hypothesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Indo-Aryan migration - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Indo-Iranians - Wikipedia, the...

Without British colonization the Indians would still be in the midst of proto-history.

No one edited anything you moron. I said The Americas slumdog. You can clearly see the "Last Edited" sign and time of date below each comment in the bottom-right section of the comment, making you even more of a fool than you have already been made to be. All one has to do is look at the...

Your ancestors are not historians or archaeologists or geneticists or anthropologists or linguists . Your ancestors are irrelevant to the discussion.

Weren't we supposed to see in 2005, and 2010, and 2012 or 2015? Yes, we will see in 2020 if you test that theory out.

Anyone who has spent more than a few days in America knows the statistics are complete BS and cannot be compared across nations. If 1 in 5 women in the US have been raped then chances are that someone in every single family has been raped. Ridiculous.

Of course it's a bunch of bull that is not taken seriously by any modern academic. Why don't Europeans look like Dravidians? Why is there a sense of continuity in the subcontinent, from lighter-skinned more Caucasoid appearance Northern Indians, and more Australoid looking darker-skinned...

Even Ukraine could outwit you in a fight. :coffee:

Banned again my American brother? :usflag:

Moldavia has been wanting to nuke Ukraine for years

It is well-known that India is among the most racist countries in the world, especially towards Blacks. In fact, Indians are some of the few people in the world that actually take pride in their bigotry and hatred. It makes them feel more dominant and special. What I've noticed is that...

Science has the answer - speciation. Anyway, this thread will probably be closed if we keep discussing this because we are going WAY off-topic. Actually never mind, because the topic is a bunch of BS anyway.

Certainly not India! Besides, what does that mean anyway? Do you hold allegiance to sub-Saharan Africa... or more specifically the nation of Kenya?

Then don't scream accusations of racism when we start fighting back ;)

1. PIE stands for Proto-Indo-Europeans. PIE is not an individual. 2. Siddartha was said to have blue eyes.... what a coincidence... 3. Who said anything about the Chinese? You are becoming hysterical. The entire subcontinent was populated by an Australoid group who shared genetic affinity with...