Search results

Sir, Welcome to 2015. i hope you enjoyed your ganja. Now, sir, if i may request you to get off your butt and go through social media and the previous 9 pages of this thread. Thankyou!

Can you please confirm my investigation as mentioned in post # 35 here, thanks?

Tujhay bhai agar aik sada si baat samjh he nahi arhe tu tray 6 feet 1 inch qad ka kya faida mujhy? Alam Channa k bicharya hoye bhai, one cannot wear uniform at any time as per his wish or whenever he wants to, but when he does, as did the Maj Saab while going home or for that matter if someone...

Yehe baat tu bhai apko samjh nahi arhe k PPC or MPML mai kya farak hai. Dont worry, once you'll fulfill your dilly desire of manhandling uniform, MPML ache terha rat jayege apko :) Let's see what Sir Raheel has to say, i beleive officer should not be kham kha sacrificed just because two idiots...

Bhai sb, apka matlab hai k goray ka kutta tommy per sada kutta kutta? Uniform, as strict there are regulation against its misuse, similar regulations are against its disgrace.

lol...twitter trial ka tu pata nh, pr Maj Mohsin saab dono taraf say L zaror lag gaye hain. Fauj nay tu sada charge laga k 'unable to handle a situation' side per kar dyna hai, per iskay course mates k tanay nahi jenay daingy isay. UAC ko chorain, bhai 6-1 ko abhi ye nahi pata k uniform...

Sir 6-1, please dig out your brain from where it has been buried and tell me what would an NYPD cop do while traveling home in uniform if he is manhandled irrespective of what 'wrong' the cop has done?

i beg you to do that, please. It just reiterates my point, nothing else. BTW, MPML be perh laina kabhi.

i for one am a strong proponent that no one, i mean no one is above the law. You have read my blogs and my posts here, and you konw that. If the officer has done what is being claimed without evidence, then he must be and will be taken to task. But that does not negate the fact that he was...

Stop acting like a typical 6-1 who has his brains below his knees and decide for once whether the officer was a superman or a pussy so that we can get on with a roper worthy debate.

And this proves what exactly?

Ab tu goli marlay bhai typo ko base bana k :)

Do you have any evidence to this or it is just the 6-1 speaking?

BTW, going by the Rule of Law and Constitution some people here are so fond of defending here, the officer was authorized to use deadly force when he was being thrashed and his car was being pelted with stone while he being inside. Why dont you read and learn those Laws first, before you people...

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about? Just because some idiot on twitter exaggerated the details of the incident and made a culprit out of the officer you are demanding a trial of the officer alone and not the second party? 200 plus people surrounds the scene, pelt stones, beat...

Waja?

Who have weak eyesight:

Chillax dudes!