Search results

You know what, you are right ;)

Oh bhai, what proof? It's a writing on the wall! Google it, if you cant get anything from your military for Gods Sake! God! Why i was even talking with you?! i say again, you dont even have the minutest of the idea of what Sunderji Doctrine, CS, ToS and PAOs is/was!! And you had the cheeks to...

This doesnt matter. The point between line here is that India is going to attack Pakistan, if there is an incident inside India whether a real one, false flag or even due to as i like to call it itch. Hence, the following ensues out of the above:- - War initiator will be India. - To be the...

Some wise man has said, i and quote: Never test the depth of water with both feet.

As you said, irrespective of the fact that the terror incident was a false flag or real, you agree that India will initiate war, right? That my sir, is known to be aggressive or being offensive. Now to correct you understanding of "Any action taken in retaliation ". Militarily, a Preemptive...

Really?! How are you sure? Do you know what are nuclear threshold is? No you dont. Believe me, we'll fcuk anybody up if they attack us, that's the bottom line you and other should take home. If and it is likely that we will, use nukes in case you guys cross even an inch of our border, it...

BTW, you are probably going to..

i am sorry to say, but then i have to say it that you have no idea what you are talking about. First, you have mixed up Theory of Simultaneity (ToS) with Cold Start, both of which were two separate and distinct doctrines atleast 10 years apart. Now, i will leave it to you to find what ToS was...

Enjoy, till the time it (you) lasts ;)

Even though none of my previous two points have been answered by defensive Indians, i still ask; when India says that "there exists a Space for Limited War within the Nuclear umbrella between Pakistan and India", how the eff can this be termed as being defensive?! "Seeking" space for war, that...

Guud boy. See, even the OP can be mistaken at times, thanks for understanding.

Stop shifting your posts, we know you are guud at it, but please, spare me. The question here is that whether Pakistan, as Ms Asthma claims and Mr Haider concurs, has 'converted' into a security state over a period of time or not. - An unpopular division of a country. - Almost all Hindus and...

You are just off by 20 odd years. Not bad!

Wrong. Pakistan was a security state since the day of its inception. Suggestion: Read history, of Pakistan i mean.

Kid, we are discussing the Security POLICY of countries here (Try to understand the difference between Policy, Strategy and Doctrine first), not what will you do or what shall we do if this happens or that shyt blows up. So, just sit around and learn!

Right, and exactly 1.5 fucks were given in response.

The Indian Amphibious brigade now converted to Reorganised Amphibious Formation (RAMFOR) is also defensive, right? :blink:

So, @levina Theory of Simultaneity, Cold Start, Pro Active Operations all are 'defensive' concepts? So are cutting Pakistan into two halves, Dissecting GT road, Surgical Strikes and finding Space for war under a Nuclear Overhang, right? #fml

Okay, okay! I admit it, it's my fault. I refused the 1K Mr Faiq once tried to give me for one of my writeups which topped ET blogs. Yaar Faiq, itna gusa?!