Search results

Ohhh! man you are sooo funny; this must be Punjab

Now I know the validity of TWO NATION THEORY :coffee:

@ http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/104320-indigenous-dream-busted-both-two-j-20-prototypes-installed-al-31-a-3.html#post1686601 Sir can you provide URLs of the sites of these two manufacturers; is hr any official site of thm regards

DefenceDog: Chechen Muslim Comrade-Follow Quran & Prophet

My signature is the most RELEVANT here 10/10

Russian views over this report covered here: http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/104472-china-military-construction-us-soviet-templates.html

Smerch has INS and gyro stabilisation in each rockets, not so the rocket hits the target exactly but so that the volley stays close together to make sure the coverage of bomblets or warheads or munitions is kept over the target area rather than spread randomly.

Weren't they made by Tipu Sultan before the Chinese??

Thnx for clearing my head. Here is what you asked; I also had seen Youtube video of it; but I don't have it anymore Fire Scout A much authoritative source: http://en.enics.ru/product

I doubt what you are saying is true; provided that A-100 itself is based on Smerch!! Though its range is marginally better than ASmerch but their are other things to ponder like: 12 Smerch volleys versus 10 of A-100 Smerch ability to launch UAV rockets [kind off new thing] don't know if...

@TaimiKhan Thnx for replying This is the most important aspect that I am configuring right now. One must know that Indian Smerches are deadly @90km; so our Nasr must out-range this...with the expertise that we have exhibited it would be a couple of year to massively increase the range of Nasr...

Sir I don't think they will have similar objectives either... A MLRS is a rapid heavy barrage system to defeat enemy forces when the group up for an attack or when they group up to defend from an attack.They are for area targets so precision is not important, but coverage is. That is why the...

Battlefield presence of nukes can't be regarded detergency in the least, sir. Deterrence must be strategic in nature so as to keep the element of surprise more clandestine which makes your assumption justified: Plus the presence of such weapons within the battlefield will much strain the...

In my observation... Look at the video above especially the 15-20 seconds & you will see abrupt maneuvers of the said missile. One thing you may have noticed is the absence of Gas dynamic control which is usually present in Russian originated systems...see this above is based on Smerch...

Sir I would disagree; the propose of any weapon isn't killing; rather its the job effectively done!! The HE fragmentation warhead will be more effective than any nuke; even a shielded tank [if you but know] is the best regarded vehicle in case of nuclear fallout...plus it will inflict damage not...

@Indians ARTHUR isn't good for quasi ballistic trajectories simply because even in the terminal stages the projectile can vary its coarse; because the propulsion unit is still ON WORK!! @Pakistanis I am unfortunate to say that are you humans...we are discussing the prospects of a nuclear [I...

I know that but still you must face the realities. I ain't saying they are bad but yes they are relatively weak

Congratulations & Congratulations...i don't know if I be a fortune teller but day before this thread I wrote: ...& perhaps my wishes come true :) Taimikhan thnx for giving technical info..however I have some reserves regrading Iskander which isn't like a common Quasi-ballistic as it can...

I know Russians aren't that good relative to US in avionics development; but I assure you that their engines will beat the hell out of any General Electrics; Rolls Royce or the likes...

the only thing we pakistanis have learned so far is not to poke our nose into other affairs...just for the sake of Muslim brotherhood