lol.. that's not my problem where you put them.. I didn't ask you to breed like insects, you did that yourself.. Your founding fathers should've thought about this “space" problem.. Sadly for you, they didn't.. And as you said yourself, they were utter fools. So, shortsightedness is kinda...
Not agreed... The Two-Nation Theory is pretty clear.. Muslims in one country and Hindus in another.. Your quaid-e-azam also kept repeating the same thing... Now, do you want to say that Jinnah was wrong and TNT is wrong?? :D
If the Arabs don't sell oil to India, someone else would.. There's Iran.. There's Nigeria.. There's Venezuela.. US, Russia, Vietnam.. you name it.!! India has diversified her petroleum imports. We don't but Oil only from the Arabs.
If the Arabs decide to stop oil sales to India, India would...
Guess what... They already did.. They carved out a country for themselves and are now living in a superb Islamic utopia.. :D
BTW, I agree with you.. They were utter fools. :-)
★ The 60% population of India that's dependent on agriculture, isn't dependent on Indus and Brahmaputra for that agriculture. The agricultural heartland of India is watered by Ganges and her tributaries in the north, and by rivers like Kaveri, Mahanadi, Krishna etc in the south. They can't...
You're not understanding... are you? Its not a matter of whether China has vested interest in Pakistan or not. Take out a map and have a look at it. The Indus originates in China, then flows through India and finally enters Pakistan.
Now, you guys are proposing that China should block the...
Sutlej is a little stream when it crosses from China into India. It accumulates all its water inside Indian landmass.. Moreover, the little territory that Sutlej flows through inside China isn't suitable for dam-building. I hope you know that dams can't just be built arbitrarily anywhere...
This is where you're completely wrong.. India hasn't been utilizing her complete share of water. And no, its not a violation of IWT at all.. If India was over utilizing the water, then that would've been a breach of IWT, not underutilization.
BTW, stop inserting CPEC into every single...
WHAT? What legitimate claims? The IWT clearly defines how much water from each river is to be used by both India and Pakistan. And guess what..IWT is a perfectly legal legitimate agreement.
The issue here is that India has been underutilizing its own share of water.. That extra water has...
Yup... You have been getting that water for decades. You should be thankful for that. India didn't really need that much water for irrigation, industrial and domestic use in previous decades, so India allowed excess water to go to Pakistan. But now, India's population and India's needs have...
Cool idea bro... Ever stopped to think where would all that stored water go when you destroy Indian dams..? :D Alteast think a bit before writing stupid stuff.
IWT disagrees with you.. :D
My dear friend... please read again what I wrote.. I was talking about a hypothetical scenario of what would happen if China blocks Indus.. One of your compatriots was suggesting that China should block Indian rivers.. I simply told him what would actually happen if his wish came true.. Read again.
lol... what do Pakistanis find wrong with this statement?
He simply said - Water that belongs to India shouldn't go to Pakistan. What's wrong in it? o.0
Which “Indian rivers" are we talking about here? Indus? Brahmaputra? Coz in both cases, if they block the rivers, the victims won't be...
Go on YouTube.. and search “Zakir Naik view on Osama". See for yourself... He literally said, and I quote - “ He (Osama) is terrorizing the Americans... He's terrorising the terrorists... So I'm with him...completely.. I'm with him."
@Dragon Ball already posted two videos.. look them up..
BTW, to understand why what he says is offensive, do this simple thought experiment. In the second video, whenever he uses the word “Islam", replace it with “Judaism" or “Hinduism" and then think how a Muslim would feel after hearing...