Search results

He said one person is injured. You guys are claiming 200-300 deaths?

They made it that far in seconds? That's what ISPR is claiming, that it lasted seconds.

As I posted before, you can solve that by posting the video of the jets dropping the bomb. Because they did nothing and they left within seconds.

I get that, but this happened in 2008 as well, and in the past. It's not something to start a war over. There is literally no evidence of any dead bodies on the ground or people being sent to hospital. Nor bharatis posting videos of their AF releasing the bombs.

He hasn't been clear what that means. Regardless, 24000 kg of explosives would cause quite a bit of destruction. Where are the dead bodies? Where are the people in hospital? Where is the destruction? Has India posted the video of them dropping bombs?

Yes, they entered our airspace. It's not worth starting a war over it. It happens all the time and no one shoots down a plane unless it escalates further. As for them dropping "whatever", as I explained, them dropping fuel tanks was unintentional. Do you know what unintentional means...

DG ISPR did not say they were bombs.

No bombs fell on Pakistani side. They dropped fuel tanks unintentionally. That is the keyword - because they did not plan on dropping the fuel tanks as their first choice. They had to do that in order to escape fast.

Them dropping fuel tanks was unintentional. That is the keyword - because they did not plan on dropping the fuel tanks as their first choice. They had to do that in order to escape fast.

Just google airspace violations and stop screwing around.

You want to start a war over bharatis unintentionally dropping their drop tanks?

Again, I don't see the point of overreaction. There is zero proof for an actual strike. No video footage from the plane, no footage from the ground, no dead bodies, no scrambling injured to the hospital, etc. They intended to carry out strikes. Instead they dropped their drop tanks so they...

There are no points here. They intended to carry out strikes. Instead they dropped their fuel tanks so they could run away faster.

How are you interpreting fuel tank to not mean payload? As I said, you can solve all of this "ISPR propaganda" by releasing video footage. There is no need to spin a story here. It is mostly Indians that are believing in this story. Regardless, you can solve this "spin" by releasing video...

What is there to learn? Why are you making a mountain out of a mole hill?

He said 1 person was injured. You said 200-300 terrorists were killed? Can you tell me what you are interpreting of the ISPR tweets? I am curious. What is in the ISPR admission that you think favours you?

60 km inside Pakistan :omghaha: No one is saying you intentionally bombed trees. You dropped payload to get away and those landed on trees. Do you note the difference. You were claiming someone is not showing full picture. I said you can fix that. Now you are saying you will believe...

There is zero proof for an actual strike. No video footage from the plane, no footage from the ground, no dead bodies, no scrambling injured to the hospital, etc. Looks like a repeat of 2016 basically.

No shit, no one is saying they didn't have intent to bomb. We are saying they didn't bomb, i.e. didn't succeed in their intentions. Then you guys can prove the strikes were real. Show the video footage of the bombs being launched. Take ISPR out of the picture. The precedent seems to be...

Again, not a strike, but dropping tanks to make their escape faster.