Search results

You are making a false equivalence. US left a chopper from their operation. Regardless, you keep ignoring the satellite pictures. They have already humiliated you. Nothing more needs to be done. You can also release of missile being launched from the plane, which you haven't.

Are you saying that there are no satellite pictures showing that the building is not effected? Also: what proof do you actually have that the airstrikes happened as claimed? I am not asking about disproving that airstrikes didn't happen, I am asking proof that they actually happened. If you...

Did you read any part of his manifesto? Do you think it aligns with anything that he might have learned in Pakistan? Or perhaps it's too much to expect common sense?

So according to these people, Pakistan should have nuked India because India dropped payload on forests that killed trees and a bird?

Provide more details on what you mean. Also provide independent impartial sources who came to the same conclusion about the satellite pictures that you came to. It seems like only you came to the conclusion but no one else knows about it. Also: what proof do you actually have that the...

In what way did they backfire? How would Pakistan make 300 bodies disappear in a matter of minutes or a few hours? Do you know something the rest of the world doesn't? Let me ask you something else: what proof do you actually have that the airstrikes happened as claimed? I am not asking...

How do you explain the satellite pictures? Do you mean the satellite pictures are doctored? That in itself destroys your story. Interesting. So you guys demand proof when India is blamed for something. But you never require proof when India claims something.

Why do they keep digging a deeper and deeper hole for themselves?

Why do you expect others release evidence when claims are made against you then?

Question for Indians: Is Pakistan fooling the satellites by placing huge pictures over the area damaged by the surgical strikes?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/india-pakistan-kashmir-satellite-schools-1.5044432 Satellite images 'don't show any evidence' of bomb damage to madrasa in Pakistan High-resolution satellite images reviewed by Reuters show that a religious school run by Jaish-e-Mohammad in northeastern Pakistan...

Wasn't the previous argument that India didn't mention any specific numbers, only that "a large number of terrorists were killed"? So was that also a lie?

This is something that still boils my blood to this day. India via groups like TTP, BLA etc killed tens of thousands of innocent people and yet the Pakistani state almost never accused them. They start accusing as soon as the sound of an attack is heard yet we keep quiet. What is this strategy...

This is a waste of time. It won't matter to the war mongers.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-kashmir-village/pakistani-village-asks-where-are-bodies-of-militants-india-says-it-bombed-idUSKCN1QH298 Pakistani village asks: Where are bodies of militants India says it bombed? JABA, Pakistan (Reuters) - The only confirmed victim of India’s air...

As usual, jingoistic bharatis trying to put their own spin on something. When will you guys ever get your head out of the sand?

I will tell you how. Let me introduce you to something called time zones. More information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone To summarize, the video is likely hosted in the US in Pacific time zone, where it would have been 26th Feb still when the video got uploaded. You should...

So let me get this straight. According to Indians: 1) An event for which there is documented proof didn't happen. 2) An event for which there is no supporting proof actually happened. Am I getting this right?

So let me get this straight. According to Indians: 1) An event for which there is documented proof didn't happen. 2) An event for which there is no supporting proof actually happened. Am I getting this right?

So let me get this straight. According to Indians: 1) An event for which there is documented proof didn't happen. 2) An event for which there is no supporting proof actually happened. Am I getting this right?