Search results

No one buy it , so it gone ,simply too expensive

I think T-14 is just overly hyped , still preferred the T-90MS

Dave Majumdar is one of the worse journalist i ever seen , his piece are always very subjective

180 km for a MMW radar is very impressive

I dont think it would help at all to be honest

not really just forum globalsecurity.org/military/world/stealth-aircraft-rcs.htm books.google.co.uk/books?id=Me1Ey5kgthgC&pg=PT300&lpg=PT300&dq=f-35+golf+ball&source=bl&ots=o2HuxoIdwb&sig=z2f5DiOAbW05jHElQWVS4f8H0kg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XUh8UazZCpKr0AXby4HAAw&ved=0CDAQ6AEwADgU...

i just read this article theboresight.blogspot.co.uk/2009/07/airborne-infrared-and-supersonic.html?m=1 , they mentioned some really strange feature for IRST such as measure range without LFR or measure velocity of target by Doppler (red/blue) shift , is the IRST really capable of doing such...

the airforce and marine still buy f-35 , the navy still buy f-35 but now they buy more f-18e/f just because of the delay no evident of f-35 get canceled , and btw j-31/20 and t-50 not any better , they still far behind in testing stage about your video calling the f-35 a failure without any...

to have a useful range your gripen need fuel tank which increase it's RCS and reduce maneuver significantly , btw can you please quote the link showing that gripen can supercruise in these configurations doesnot mean much f-35 cannot sustain supersonic speed without afterburner but it have...

what you mean ?

you should watch this youtube.com/watch?v=lT8_9hhMEMw btw i dont see su-30/35 can have any advantages against f-35 in both bvr and wvr 1-bvr : f-35 rcs = 0.001 m2 , su-35 rcs = 2 m2 ( the su-35 have rcs =10 m2 but some source say with ram treatment it come down to 1 m2 :what: so missiles +...

this is BS , almost every single fighter flying today can do both AA and AG even the f-22 will have thatability in future wrong f-35 compromised in top speed, maneuvrability for stealth but it have DAS , DIRCM , hobs missiles to solve these compromises and j-31 will have to do the same BS...

top speed isnot important , the important thing is your cruise speed ,and the speed at which you can launch missiles which we dont know if j-31 is any better wrong , poor compared to what ? if you think the f-35 have poor agility because of the public low g sustained then read this if you...

btw the low sustain g number of f-35 mean nothing unless you put it in specific situation Example f-16 is very agile but in some situation .nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/FactSheets/FS-025-DFRC.html

koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/10/205_97236.html even with the future radar the ef-2000 can only see the f-35 at half the range that the f-35 can attack it :rolleyes: and the EF-2000's irst dont have LFR which mean it can't provide firing solution for missiles :cheesy: 60 km different in...

2-in WVR the su-35 may be more maneuver but the F-35 have DAS + JHMCS that allow it to launch missiles at enemy coming from direction, and no matter how agile the su-35 is i dont think it can out maneuver a missiles like aim-132 or aim-9x whixh can turn 70-80 G not to mention F-35 will also...

i dont see su-30/35 can have any advantages against f-35 in both bvr and wvr 1-bvr : f-35 rcs = 0.001 m2 , su-35 rcs = 2 m2 ( the su-35 have rcs =10 m2 but some source say with ram treatment it come down to 1 m2 :what: so missiles + pylon will increase rcs by at least 1 m2 ) => f-35 can...

will anti ship missile using ir or iir seeker like SOM or NSM be useless if the enemy ship is equip with something like intermat or Camuflaje Adaptiv:confused: Camuflaje Adaptiv BAE system - YouTube BBC News - Tanks test infrared invisibility cloak Intermat - Thermal and Radar Signature...

can you guy answer some of my little question :D +what is the different between zoom climb and sustain climb :confused: what is the factor limit the max operate altitude of missile , plane :confused: is that the lack of air , what can fly higher turbojet , turbofan , ramjet or scramjet...

actually iam talking about external carrier