Search results

I added a few more lines to that post, which you may not have seen. My only point is that USA has no right to talk unfavourably about other countries sponsoring insurgencies. For every insurgency that Russia or India have sponsored, USA has sponsored many, and continues to do so.

The one factor that has always proved to be a peacemaker among people, is trade. Two countries that have a lot of investment in each other will not go to war and destroy their investment. Exchange of ideas has become so easy only in reccent times, with the advent of the internet.

You are confusing India and Pakistan. Having fought decades of foreign funded insurgency, we would be the last to condone that. Besides, don't you think replacing 'India' with 'USA' would make a lot more sense? How many insurgencies has the US armed, trained and funded in the past, and how many...

And what should be done with those bad kafirs? People who choose not to follow your religion? The hindus, sikhs and atheists for example?

One thing that Indian and Pakistani right wingers have in common is their hatred of secularism. For them, it's a dirty word.

What is COBRA course?

Aziz has apologised for defending APS attack, says Nisar - Pakistan - DAWN.COM WASHINGTON: Maulana Abdul Aziz, the imam of Islamabad’s Lal Masjid, has submitted a written apology to police over his implied defence of the Dec 16 attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar, Interior Minister...

I didn't get you, what is your point?

Huh?? I'm pretty sure this can't be right. I think the reporter is misquoting - there is no way that a pilot would make such a statement, that the Sukhoi is the only plane fighter that can do a yaw.

But you did, implicitly, when you talked about prostitution and drugs on a thread that did not reference either.