Search results

My apologies, they've agreed to include 6 more members so the total has risen to 11, but the concensus rule to include new members remains. In effect each one has a veto as far as admiting new members is concerned.

To do so would require concensus among all, if a single one disagrees it will not go through and we would be back to square one. I'd recommend reading up on how decisions pertaining to adding new members to BRICS is done. Google is your friend. Displaying ignorance is a sign of weak intellect...

Entry in BRICS is by concensus, meaning that all five members should agree for inclusion of a new member, in effect granting each member a veto power. Given the sour relations, either GoC would have to give up significant leverage to secure the Indian nod or GoP would have to do it itself...

You're asking for proof that its not hard to land at the south pole. Its highly improbable that such a proof exists. Absent that we can assume that nations with higher tech development can in fact land there. Therefore, relatively, if many can do it, then it would either be more harder than...

Theres a difference between landing something and surving on a particular spot. Given the technological advantages the US, Europe, China and Russia have, it is not wrong to assume that these nations have the capability to land there. Its just that no one has tried it before. No one tried to do...

Welcome to the picnic, what took you so long.

You think 200 nuclear bombs are enough to kill all? They are a defensive measure, not an offensive one.

Yes, yes you made that point. Commendations on winning that contest. Lets get back to the main topic, we're figuring out what you can and cannot say, love the artfull way of not answering, personally a big fan of your methods. I'll reiterate, what would happen to a person if they graffiti...

Apparently you can graffiti in London, so much so that even foreigners can do it. Its the punishment that varies. Some places its a monetary fine, in some its a death sentence while others would merely dock your social credit score. Interesting take on not living in the past, how far of range...

Ah, the algorithms allow for conversation about Tiananmen square. Lets test it further, Would a graffiti, painted on the walls of Beijing, saying "Absolutely nothing happened in Tiananmen sqaure in the year 1989" be punished or would the offender be free to post about it on the internet?

Good job comrade, you have successfully defeated the vile Indian, you can bask in a job well done. Not at all, we're filthy and dirty, no freedom for us. Now that thats been settled, I'd like to poke at what your allowed to say and hilariously dance around. Can you at the very least say that...

My good man, you have a brain, utilise it. I do understand what they wrote, thats not the topic we're discussing. The fact that you cant deviate beyond what your own little red book says is glaringly obvious and a bit hilarious. You who doesn't have the freedom to talk is critisizing the...

Will there be repercussions if say hypothetically a person spray painted that "on Tiananmen square in 1989 nothing happened" on a Beijing street. Its odd that your talking points don't allow you much breathing room beyond what you're instructed to.

If a person spray painted grafitti criticising the government or CCP or any revered leader in Beijing, what would the punishment be?

I'd like to posit otherwise. The OP is a masterful troll masquerading as an imbecile. Space program is about building capability, the supply chain to make it possible. Your views are also perfectly valid, as a nation that suffers from human underdevelopment it is understandable that human...

That is a very valid viewpoint, but the points you've listed are recurring costs. They would need to be done again and again, we wont be solving those problems with that approach. The better long tern solution would be to create industries, and I believe this does that. All the mentioned...

The money spent is not loaded onto rockets and sent to the moon, i hope you do understand that. It goes towards jobs and industries that are Indian, so in essence the resources are spent in creating capability and jobs. I do not understand the ignorance on this matter

Its not really about my support tbh. Its about the argument being made, if your diplomats say historical rule is no basis then it contradicts the stand with respect to Chinese position on the south china sea

Doesn't this statement undermine the Chinese position with regards to South China sea. As I understand it, historical antecedent was the basis for the claim.

No, double digit growth is harmfull in the long run due to its overdependance on credit to fuel it. Its a double edged sword. Makes all that growth prone to crashes and immense wastage of resources on unviable projects. Sustainable growth of around 8~9 would ensure that gains would be around...