Search results

1. It is wisdom to realise what we do know and what we do not 2. It is intelligence to ask for help in areas one is lacking when lives are at stake 3. It is shame that prevents one from hollering or grinding an agenda when it is unrelated and lives are at stake You exhibit none.

No of course not, and i do understand the sentiment you're alluding to, but the sentiment while noble does not match the current reality. Practically, besides religion, there exists no other binding factor. Absent a strong enough declaration from the other party it would be incorrect to expect...

Muslim bretheren don't see themselves as a collective across the globe, at least the lack of real action suggests so

1. Understood, thank you for clarifying that 2. It works if they took the mantle of morality in the first place, like if they proclaimed to be the representatives of the faithfull. Absent that would that not be expecting others to be just with no cause but morality, a sentiment while noble but...

1. Its neither a justification to turn a blind eye to an injustice or an attempt to normalise it 2. It is equally incorrect to assume morality from a nation since they act in self interest while keeping morality as a secondary virtue 3. What happened here in India was wrong as well, you've...

1. What about sufficient safeguards, like protective head gear, gloves, mouth clamps etc, would having such safeguards make it within permissible limits? One could argue that having professionals throwing balls at you at 140+km/hr would be harmfull to the body as well. Lots of sports could be...

Ok, but what exactly is your point though? If you want to rail against India, you're free to do so, but you'd find me a poor audience for it

1. Was boxing prohibited? i ask from a place of ignorance 2. You're right, that would be the decent thing to do, but on a national scale for a country which is trying to increase tourism and increase holding such events, personal interest would triump morality. It would be unrealistic to expect...

This is hypocrisy manifest. Free speech when it suits the ruling polity. Atleast one can console themselves that it is merely introduced and not passed, but with the current state of affairs who knows

Simple, no voter base or political agenda to be gained by doing so by any political parties

1. What makes a sport halal? 2. Ki kare sahab? Stop all activity cuz of the war?

Not gonna lie, that was a good zing, Made me chuckle:D What baffles me is the triggered reaction to it, like this is legit the pakistani defence forum, what are Indian posters expecting, a shabashi and a pat on the back?:no:

Not necessarily, US law prohibits weapon carrying ships to be repaired in a foreign dock. Primarily it was a measure to protect business for its own repair docks. Repairing logistical ships would be immensely benefitial as it would improve supply lines and reduce downtime while ensuring...

Might from Pax Brittania Then continuation from uncle sam. Unless one changes that factor, the age of deciding borders on might is past.

I believe you're using the incorrect formula, South Park university already posited the correct measurement formula, and we're well above the average When in Rome :D

Frankly, its because majority of the Indians here come to gloat, and are equal partners in shitposting with their Pakistani counterparts. Like it or not, it is Pakistan defence forum. There are numerous eggheads here of all colours. Some have made it the focal point of their lives to incite...

I would appeal to the logician in you. 1. You made an assertion that logical arguments are welcome 2. I made a post stating my opinion on the matter 3. You rebutted and fair enough maybe sensitivities are too high 4. Why is it my remit to admonish or defend anothers views irrespective of...

Its simple arithmacy, a ship can transport hundreds of tons of cargo in one go, whereas a train tens of tons and a truck a fraction. Scale of economics favours ships anyday. You divide the total fuel spent by the total cargo and theres no comparison between the two. Dynamic borders and...

If memory serves, you once asked me to refrain from using the german language because it was unfiting for an Indian using it. You've no justification cribbing about the trollish behavior that you're as much guilty of if not more. You've no objectivity, perhaps justifiably due to the opposing...