U omitted the hypocrisy in his reasoning...the reverse situation occurred in Junagadh...where the Muslim ruler had acceded to Pakistan...but the majority of the population was Hindu. On this pretext India invaded and captured it...and held a plebiscite to then be able to say "the people wanted...
First u didn't answer any of my questions...secondly by saying that India threatened Pakistan into releasing Abhinandan u r implying that Pakistan is weak and India is super strong that it was able to strong arm Pakistan.
Hence why I posed those questions that u r trying hard not to answer...
Oh look another brilliant reasoning u pulled out from ur behind. Tell me has Pakistan ever withheld POWs against Geneva conventions? No
Now how about u answer these questions below...
1) If India is so mighty and Pakistan is so scared...why didn't Pakistan just quietly take it when India...
Ur idiotic logic is not a surprise...I see many Indian trolls with such low IQ. As pointed out before...Abhinandan was a POW...and hence he had to be released as per Geneva convention. Indian threat of missile attacks was countered by Pak's own threats of retaliating missile strikes with missile...
F16s were not used in operation swift retort.
As in the aircrafts used to infiltrate Indian airspace and strike at targets(the planned strike under the operation swift retort) were JF17s and Mirages. F16s were on CAP in case IAF engaged. The IAF jets that did end up engaging...were then promptly...
Besides stopping deforestation...Pakistan should focus on mitigating land desertification and set a long term goal to slowly turn the deserts of Sindh and Balochistan green. Below is an informative video that touches on these things...and what is being done about it in other countries.
This is nothing compared to Indian government's threats to jail Twitter's employees if twitter doesn't block the accounts that the Indian government wants it to block.
https://www.engadget.com/india-government-jail-twitter-employees-block-critics-122405568.html
^this alone deserves its own...
This just means we need to make broader efforts to teach some basic principles and manners to ppl...so at least we(as a society) can go on a course correction.
This mob mentality and taking the law into our own hands turning violent without any regard of finding out the truth...is simply...
The examples u r giving are irrelevant to what I was saying...I have already mentioned that the great powers(who r also members of UNSC) can do whatever they want...
...as for the tangential argument u mentioned here that even if China/Russia veto something US wants to do...US can still go ahead...