Search results

Difficult to manage? Talk about understatement, you or whichever other moon touched fool tried it would be dead in a matter of days if not hours! :p:

I was referring to all of us, across borders, as an international phenomenon.

I'm being pitched by Oscar to be a part of his empire atm. That and wondering why people actually love being jingos, what business do we have pontificating on matters of defence (often highly technical) anyway?

You children have way too much time on your hands. Your on a defence forum for the love of all that's holy and chews on grass, get into it!

Yarra that's a broad term sort of thing you're envisioning there. I am talking of how exactly can collaboration exist between ADA and HAL because at the end of the day LCA MK.1 and 2 and the AMCA (if it ever comes about) will be ADA designs with HAL churning them out, so how can HAL play its...

Which firm? Mashallah! This should be one of those driving technologies!

Tell me something though, now that we have ADA running about as a reality with almost all the responsibility for designing the indigenous front line aerospace products (LCA, AMCA) how do you reconcile that with HAL's envisaged role of being the "provider" for the IAF, I mean how do you get HAL...

No mention? Feel unloved. The point people tend to miss is that firstly, no one, not the French and not our own sasurs are going pass on the Know-why. The issue lies in trying to explain the sheer complexities of the process which are comprised within the simple sounding line "materials to...

Some details please. What sort of water desalination are we talking about, as in what sort of technology? What is the scope of the pilot project? Dish it out if you can. AND CONGRATULATIONS!

Is that so? And I guess its fine tuned by some babu right? All well and good, and implemented by whom, same babu. Well sahib, management if not your cup of tea it seems, leave it be.

Oh oh oh..LOL! So you think, you think that saying "yes" will do it, you think implementation works that way! :lol:

You'll do worse than Antony, Manmohan and co. Acumen is not a function of intellect, which the folks in the cabinet have in heaps, it is a function of capability and appetite to plan, follow the plan with consistency and the political gumption to deal with the attendant...

COMMITTED TO THE DEFENCE SECTOR! :lol: Better than the UPA lot, yes, by somewhat of a margin. But it is nowhere close to what we need, as in what we needed yesterday forget now. And no, before people quibble about something being better than nothing, this isn't a matter so trivial, this is...

Spares will be available, oh man, let me put it this way, earlier last year the ADA chief grinned and quipped that a little while back we didn't even know that MRO in itself is a technology and a separate and complex field of expertise. Unless things move from the ad hoc to the planned, what...

There would still be Jag upgrades, you want the LCA running interdiction and strikes with how many squadrons? At what rate will you build and populate said squadrons? Unless you chalk up 10+ squadrons of LCA and build 30+ crafts a year the Jags would still be upgraded.

More modern fighters which we CANNOT BUY! Multirole ACs which we CANNOT BUY! The Rafale and the FGFA in the future will take the slots (AND EVEN THEN WE WILL HAVE 12 SQUADRON SHORTFALL BY 2032), paisa tum donate karoge

Hype wanted to kill you last year itself, I stopped him since I still thought you as my brother back then.

Yes BUT WHY? when MBDA swears by the Aster with a 12g lateral acceleration what was the reason for something like the Barak-8 (I mean 80g seems exorbitant, in fact I had a nice talk with folks from the IWI and they said they were happy to trade range and speed in the design for said figure)?

All I want to do is smother you so that @Hyperion and me can go about creating Naswaristan, you will have plenty of company down under once we are done with the required genocide. :mad:

When you say I don't agree, you need to substantiate, unless of course you want to quibble with me over the technical details.