So if Hamas has military activities inside a hospital, it may legally be attacked after a warning - unless Hamas stops their military activities inside the hospital.
Since Hamas wants to ensure that Palestinians gets killed no such announcement was made.
That is Your opinion. Not my opinion.
Due to the extensive network of tunnels under Gaza there are houses which can legally be attacked.
I do not claim that any specific house attacked has a military value.
(Though there are reports by doctors and NGOs that certain hospitals are used to protect...
You are welcome to show evidence that any specific house in Gaza was not perceived to have a military value, and/or evidence that any specific individual killed was not present in what was believed to be a military target.
And I guess you are for genocidal, racist, nazi palestinians.
6
Your link certainly does not contain any evidence. It simply says that it is suspected that Israel has committed war crimes.
The evidence of Hamas indiscriminate firing of missiles is however obvious..
So I’ll wait until evidence of Israeli war crimes is presented by reputable organisations
I point out the rules of war.
Since Hamas never follows the rules of war, they are immediately put in a bad light,
And no, I do not justify. I simply show things like:
* That civilians ars killed is not evidence of a war crime
* That White Phosphorus are used is not evidence of a war crime.
*...
Palestinians have a legitimate right to resist Israel.
Hamas has no legitimity whatsoever due to its behaviour.
If Israel wanted to kill every Palestinian in Gaza they would have dropped a nuke.
Which is of course a lie, and as usual without sources.
You are referring to the treaty on incendiary weapons which bans the use of incendiary weapons in populated areas and the treaty explicitly says that smoke grenades are not incendiary weapons.
The use of the grenade in question is...
And independent journalists have said that Hamas threatens any organisation or magazine with assassination of their employees if they mention the Hamas headquarters within hospitals.
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/wa-blog/gaza-er-hamas-hiding-in-shifa-hospital/4086/
They are not ”considered” smoke projectiles. They are smoke projectiles.
which you would know if You spent 30 seconds googling, but noooo….
At least you have appeared to learn that all white phosphorous munitions are not incendiary weapons.
Military use justifies bombing ”civilian” buildings since they are no longer civilian.
It is all in the fourth Geneva Convention.
The proper procedure if Hamas wants to protect civilians is to designate areas where they do not keep any weapons or troops nor military installations including...
Not in the same way as Gaza.
By bombing civilian buildings, I guess…
Russia has been doing this for the last 20 months.
Civilian buildings with weapons depots or tunnels for military use are military targets. Gaza is criss-crossed with such tunnels. Therefore I make no claim of war crimes...
Sweden did not sell ”vital war material”. It sold iron ore to Germany which does not violate neutrality. Most of the iron ore was high phosphorus which is useless for making guns. It is good to make railroad tracks. Sweden also sold ball bearings to the allies. Again not violating neutrality.
Ukraine cities are civilian areas. Hamas has spent billions on fortifying Gaza which means that there are plenty of military targets. Few if none here would know where they are.