Search results

canals here are made by own funds as well. mineral extraction is another game entirely. but, yes, i agree with the rest. dude, the afghans and their bros here are busy in smuggling dollars to afghanistan. they arent entirely without dollars. this isnt corp commander planning, but PMLN...

indians and hindus, in general, have a habit of glorifying even their defeats (recent bollywood movies about panipat and alauddin are an example), and portray their victories as if they were Sri Lanka fighting against USA (a david vs goliath like portrayal). they are masters of storytelling and...

who would have abolished it? Muslim League's members belonging to what is now Pakistan were all feudals. Pir Ilahi Bukhsh etc. in Sindh, similar in Punjab (pirs and landlords). Balochistan joined through a session of very same feudals, or by accession of princely states like Kalat, Makran...

only in 65. and was still heavily outnumbered by india. in 71, india had the upper hand as the sanctions had hobbled pakistan's ability to maintain its equipment for past 6 years.

it was the soviet occupation that caused the rebellion. it was the commies who invited in the soviets. it was the commies who killed their president and grabbed power. it wasnt the US or pakistan arming the rebels. it was all afghans themselves.

when? would love to know more.

the network itself was HQ'd at afghanistan. how hard is it for you to understand that? and any and all branches, in other countries, were gradually wiped off.

the arrogant idiots only made that offer when the US started bombing and they realized what they were up against. before the bombings, pakistan (musharraf) had sent delegations of diplomats and ulema to make the taliban see sense. but they didnt listen. 2 decades of murders, rapes, destruction...

except that the brother of khan of qalat rebelled first. going against his own brother's decision. its god of he was labelled a traitor and put down. also, bhutto wasnt a punjabi, and he was supported by akbar bugti in removing said govt.

yeah, they should carry out an investigation. the victims look like can be from our coastal regions, but they can also be from any gulf country.

qadian was in east punjab, mirza ghulam ahmed was a punjabi himself, and most of the qadianis are punjabis. looks like he is just a self-hater, or hates the ethnicity of his prophet, lol. one of his most famous predictions was that qadian will grow so big that it will absorb lahore and people...

now you are just ranting. no one is defending the military leadership or their involvement in politics. this is a separate matter. learn to differentiate between things without confusing them.

damn. chinese at it again. do we know for sure that they were pakistani? balochistan govt did protest about fishing in its waters a few months ago. dont know what became of that.

and where is that national consensus? even after the floods and the recent rape, the sindhis will still vote for same waderas, the baloch will vote for the same sardars holding them hostage, only the pashtuns, some of the punjabis and karachiites have shown a shift in their voting patterns...

now signalian will arrive and justify the extra-constitutional actions of his beloved deptt.

priorities. ndc (nescom) lobby is strong. they get most of the funding. as long as we have someone to provide us satellite-based intel or access to a guidance system, why waste money on a space program? at least thats what i think the people in decision making roles are thinking. lol, punjabis...

yeeeeah, you didnt get the point, did you?

salim mehmud is responsible for most of the malaise and incompetence, which continued into the 90s thanks to ppp and pmln. bringing in the faujis was just an attempt by musharraf to set things right. it backfired, and now the faujis have grabbed another seat. changing the head doesnt change...

it is a disappointment, but no, not all launches are SPD. suparco was involved with shaheed, and abdali, i think. the entire missile program was shifted to NDC a few years ago (was a collab before).

everyone other than you people.